Judge: Daniel M. Crowley, Case: 22STCV02674, Date: 2022-08-16 Tentative Ruling
Case Number: 22STCV02674 Hearing Date: August 16, 2022 Dept: 28
Plaintiff’s Counsel Robert S. Walch’s
Motion to Be Relieved as Counsel
Having considered the moving papers, the Court rules as
follows.
BACKGROUND
On
January 21, 2022, Plaintiff Derek Zupancic (“Plaintiff”) filed this action
against Defendants The Kroger Co. (“Kroger”), Ralphs Grocery Company
(“Ralphs”), M703 Kroger West/Ralphs (“M703”) and James Flanagan (“Flanagan”)
for premises liability.
On
February 16, 2022, Defendant Hughes Markets, Inc. dba Ralphs (“Hughes”) filed
an answer for Kroger, Ralphs and M703.
On
July 12, 2022, Plaintiff’s Counsel Robert S. Walch filed a Motion to be
Relieved as Counsel, both to be heard on August 16, 2022.
Trial
is currently scheduled for July 21, 2023.
PARTY’S REQUESTS
Plaintiff’s
counsel, Robert S. Walch requests to be relieved as counsel for Plaintiff.
LEGAL STANDARD
California
Rule of Court rule 3.1362 (Motion to Be Relieved as Counsel) requires (1)
notice of motion and motion to be directed to the client (made on the Notice of
Motion and Motion to be Relieved as Counsel—Civil form (MC-051)); (2) a
declaration stating in general terms and without compromising the
confidentiality of the attorney-client relationship why a motion under Code of
Civil Procedure section 284(2) is brought instead of filing a consent under
Code of Civil Procedure section 284(1) (made on the Declaration in Support of
Attorney's Motion to Be Relieved as Counsel—Civil form (MC-052)); (3) service
of the notice of motion and motion and declaration on all other parties who
have appeared in the case; and (4) the proposed order relieving counsel
(prepared on the Order Granting Attorney’s Motion to Be Relieved as
Counsel—Civil form (MC-053)).
The
court has discretion to allow an attorney to withdraw, and such a motion should
be granted provided that there is no prejudice to the client, and it does not
disrupt the orderly process of justice. (Ramirez v. Sturdevant (1994) 21
Cal.App.4th 904, 915.)
DISCUSSION
The
MC-053 form is incomplete. Counsel did not identify if the attorney personally
served or served Plaintiff by mail, nor did counsel list Plaintiff’s current or
last known address and telephone number. There is no indication of what
additional hearings are scheduled or if trial has been set, yet. As such, the
Court denies the motion.
CONCLUSION
Counsel for Plaintiff’s Motions to be Relieved
as Counsel is DENIED.
Counsel
for Plaintiff is ordered to give notice of this ruling.
Counsel
for Plaintiff is
ordered to file the proof of service of this ruling with the Court within five
days.
The parties are directed to the header of this
tentative ruling for further instructions.