Judge: Daniel M. Crowley, Case: 22STCV20251, Date: 2022-12-20 Tentative Ruling

Case Number: 22STCV20251    Hearing Date: December 20, 2022    Dept: 28

Plaintiff Jeffrey Wittek’s Application for Pro Hac Vice Admission of Stephen K. Lewis

Having considered the moving papers, the Court rules as follows. 

 

BACKGROUND

On June 21, 2022, Plaintiff Jeffrey Wittek (“Plaintiff”) filed this action against Defendants David Dobrik (“Dobrik”), David Dobrik, LLC (“Dobrik, LLC”) and Dirt Gear Co., LLC (“Dirt”) for general negligence and intentional tort.

On September 21, 2022, Dobrik and Dobrik LLC filed an answer. On October 26, 2022, the Court dismissed Dirt, without prejudice, pursuant to Plaintiff’s request.

On September 22, 2022, Plaintiff filed an application for Pro Hac Vice Admission of Stephen K. Lewis, to be heard on November 16, 2022.

Trial is currently set for August 4, 2023.

 

PARTY’S REQUESTS

Plaintiff requests the Court admit Stephen K. Lewis, pro hac vice.

 

LEGAL STANDARD

California Rule of Court, rule 9.40 provides that an attorney in good standing in another jurisdiction may apply to appear as counsel pro hac vice in the State of California by filing a verified application together with proof of service by mail of a copy of the application and notice of hearing on all parties who have appeared in the case and on the State Bar of California at its San Francisco office, with payment of a $50.00 fee, so long as that attorney is not a resident of the State of California, and is not regularly engaged in substantial business, professional, or other activities in the State of California.

The application must state: (1) the applicant’s residence and office addresses; (2) the courts to which the applicant has been admitted to practice and the dates of admission; (3) that the applicant is a member in good standing in those courts; (4) that the applicant is not currently suspended or disbarred in any court; (5) the title of each court and cause in which the applicant has filed an application to appear as counsel pro hac vice in this state in the preceding two years, the date of each application, and whether or not it was granted; and (6) the name, address, and telephone number of the active member of the State Bar of California who is attorney of record in the local action.  (Cal. Rules of Court, rule 9.40, subd. (d).)

 

DISCUSSION

Lewis is in good standing in Nevada and will be associated with California attorney John R. Ramirez. He is not regularly employed in California and does not regularly engage in substantial business, professional, or other activities in the State of California.

Lewis filed an application to be admitted Pro Hac Vice, which included the following information: his residential and office address, the courts that he is admitted to (along with dates of admissions), assurance he is in good standing, a record of all California pro hac vice appearances in the last two years, and information on the local attorney of record. Plaintiff submitted proof of service on all parties.

Plaintiff has not submitted proof of service on the California State Bar, or proof of payment. The Court grants the motion, conditional upon Counsel providing proof of payment and service.

 

CONCLUSION

Plaintiff Jeffrey Wittek’s Application for Pro Hac Vice Admission of Stephen K. Lewis is GRANTED, conditional upon Plaintiff submitting proper proof of payment and service on the California State Bar. 

            Moving party is ordered to give notice of this ruling.

Moving Party is ordered to file the proof of service of this ruling with the Court within five days.

The parties are directed to the header of this tentative ruling for further instructions.