Judge: Daniel M. Crowley, Case: 22STCV23318, Date: 2023-08-21 Tentative Ruling
Case Number: 22STCV23318 Hearing Date: September 18, 2023 Dept: 71
Superior Court of California
County of Los Angeles
DEPARTMENT
71
TENTATIVE RULING
|
CARLA
LANGLEY, vs. HAROLD
G. BECKS. |
Case No.: 22STCV23318 Hearing
Date: September 18, 2023 |
Defendant Harold G. Becks’ motion to compel Plaintiff Carla
Langley to attend her deposition and produced the
documents and things requested in the notice of deposition is granted. Plaintiff is to appear for deposition within 3
days.
Defendant’s
request for monetary sanctions on the motion to compel deposition is granted in
the reduced amount of $1,635.00 against Plaintiff and her counsel of record. Sanctions are payable within 20 days.
Defendant Harold G. Becks (“Becks”) (“Defendant”)
moves to compel Plaintiff Carla Langley (“Langley”) (“Plaintiff”) to appear for deposition and produce responsive documents. (Notice of Motion, pg. 2; C.C.P. §2025.450.) Defendant also requests
an award of sanctions against Plaintiff and Steven Tamer to pay expenses and
costs incurred on this motion. (Notice
of Motion, pg. 2.)
Having reviewed Defendant’s Motion to Compel Plaintiff
to Attend and Produce Writings at Deposition, the Court rules as follows.
On August
8, 2023, Defendant served a Notice of Deposition and Request to Inspect
Writings on Plaintiff for a deposition on August 24, 2023. (Decl. of Long ¶3, Exh. A.) Defendant’s counsel declares Defendant is an
attorney, and to reduce litigation costs, he has associated into this case as
an attorney of record. (Decl. of Long
¶4, Exh. C.) Defendant’s counsel
declares that when Plaintiff’s counsel, Steven Tamer, became aware that
Defendant would be taking Plaintiff’s deposition, Tamer complained that his
client had a sexual harassment claim against him and stated Plaintiff would not
attend the deposition. (Decl. of Long ¶5.) Defendant’s counsel declares that after
discussions with Tamer, she agreed that Defendant would ask questions at the
deposition unrelated to the issues of harassment and that Defendant’s counsel
would ask the questions regarding the sexual harassment claim. (Decl. of Long ¶5, Exh. C.) Plaintiff never served a written objection to
Defendant and Plaintiff did not seek a protective order. (Decl. of Long ¶6.)
The
Court grants the motion pursuant to C.C.P. §2025.450 and orders Plaintiff to appear for
deposition and produce responsive documents in 3 days.
Defendant requests monetary sanctions totaling $2,085.00
against Plaintiff and Tamer.
The Court awards sanctions
pursuant to C.C.P. §2030.290(c) in the amount of $1,635.00 calculated as
follows:
2 hours to prepare instant
motion + 0.5 hours to appear at hearing = 2.5 hours
($450 per hour x 2.5 hours)
+ $60 filing fee + $450.00 court reporter fee = $1,635.00
The sanctions are payable by
Plaintiff and her counsel within 20 days of this order.
Moving Party is to give
notice of this ruling.
Dated: September _____, 2023
|
|
|
Hon. Daniel M.
Crowley |
|
Judge of the
Superior Court |