Judge: Daniel M. Crowley, Case: 23STCV03727, Date: 2024-02-28 Tentative Ruling
Case Number: 23STCV03727 Hearing Date: February 29, 2024 Dept: 71
Superior
Court of California
County
of Los Angeles
DEPARTMENT 71
TENTATIVE
RULING
108 W 2ND STREET, LLC,
vs. HIGGINS LOFT, et al. |
Case No.:
20STCV48455 Hearing Date: February 29, 2024 |
Plaintiff Edison Downtown’s
Counsel, Giandominic Vitiello’s, Motion to Be Relieved as Counsel is granted.
On
July 29, 2022, Plaintiff Edison Downtown (“Edison”) (“Plaintiff”) filed its
operative Complaint against Defendants Higgins Loft AKA Higgins Loft Homeowners
Association (“HOA”), John Agnew (“Agnew”), and Prime Association Services (“Prime”)
(collectively, “Defendants”) in Case No. 22STCV24630, a related case to the
instant lead case. On November 4, 2022, Defendants
filed their Answer.
On
January 5, 2024, Edison’s counsel, Giandominic Vitiello of Katchko, Vitiello
& Karikomi, PC, filed the instant Motion to be Relieved as Counsel.
Trial
is set for July 29, 2024.
Legal
Standard
California Rule of Court rule 3.1362 (Motion to Be Relieved as Counsel)
requires (1) notice of motion and motion to be directed to the client (made on
the Notice of Motion and Motion to be Relieved as Counsel—Civil form (MC-051));
(2) a declaration stating in general terms and without compromising the
confidentiality of the attorney-client relationship why a motion under Code of
Civil Procedure section 284(2) is brought instead of filing a consent under
Code of Civil Procedure section 284(1) (made on the Declaration in Support of
Attorney’s Motion to Be Relieved as Counsel—Civil form (MC-052)); (3) service
of the notice of motion and motion and declaration on all other parties who
have appeared in the case; and (4) the proposed order relieving counsel
(prepared on the Order Granting Attorney’s Motion to Be Relieved as
Counsel—Civil form (MC-053)).
The court has discretion to allow an attorney to withdraw, and such a
motion should be granted provided that there is no prejudice to the client, and
it does not disrupt the orderly process of justice. (Ramirez v. Sturdevant (1994) 21 Cal.App.4th
904, 915.)
Discussion
Counsel
has submitted completed MC-051, MC-052, and MC-053 forms. Counsel has provided
a declaration stating a there is a breakdown of the attorney-client
relationship. (See Decl. of Vitiello.) Counsel has indicated that Edison was served
with copies of the motion papers filed with the declaration at Edison’s last
known address and confirmed within the past 30 days that the address is current
by telephone and conversation.
Conclusion
Edison’s counsel’s Motion to
Be Relieved as Counsel is granted.
Counsel will be relieved upon
filing proof of service on their client of the Order Granting Attorney’s Motion
to Be Relieved as Counsel—Civil (Judicial Council form MC-053).
Moving Party to give notice.
Dated: February _____, 2024
|
Hon.
Daniel M. Crowley |
Judge
of the Superior Court |