Judge: Daniel M. Crowley, Case: 23STCV16891, Date: 2024-08-29 Tentative Ruling
Case Number: 23STCV16891 Hearing Date: August 29, 2024 Dept: 71
County
of Los Angeles
DEPARTMENT 71
TENTATIVE
RULING
|
CHRIS HAAS, et al.,
vs. HIGHTIMES HOLDING CORP., et al. |
Case
No.: 23STCV16891 Hearing Date: August 29, 2024 |
Defendant Hightimes Holding
Corp.’s counsel, Kapin PLLC’s, Motion to Be Relieved as Counsel is granted.
Defendant Trans-High Corporation’s
counsel, Kapin PLLC’s, Motion to Be Relieved as Counsel is granted.
On
July 19, 2023, Plaintiffs Chris Haas, Carla Baumgartner, and Eric Steele (collectively,
“Plaintiffs”) filed their operative Complaint against Defendants Hightimes
Holding Corp. (“Hightimes”), Trans-High Corporation (“Trans-High”), Jay Paul
Henderson (“Henderson”), and Christopher Chabot (“Chabot”) (collectively, “Defendants”).
On
September 18, 2023, Defendants filed their Answer.
On
March 5, 2024, Hightimes’ and Trans-High’s counsel, Kapin PLLC, filed the
instant Motions to be Relieved as Counsel.
Trial
is set for December 9, 2024.
Legal
Standard
California Rule of Court rule 3.1362 (Motion to Be Relieved as Counsel)
requires (1) notice of motion and motion to be directed to the client (made on
the Notice of Motion and Motion to be Relieved as Counsel—Civil form (MC-051));
(2) a declaration stating in general terms and without compromising the
confidentiality of the attorney-client relationship why a motion under Code of
Civil Procedure section 284(2) is brought instead of filing a consent under
Code of Civil Procedure section 284(1) (made on the Declaration in Support of Attorney’s
Motion to Be Relieved as Counsel—Civil form (MC-052)); (3) service of the
notice of motion and motion and declaration on all other parties who have
appeared in the case; and (4) the proposed order relieving counsel (prepared on
the Order Granting Attorney’s Motion to Be Relieved as Counsel—Civil form
(MC-053)).
The court has discretion to allow an attorney to withdraw, and such a
motion should be granted provided that there is no prejudice to the client, and
it does not disrupt the orderly process of justice. (Ramirez v. Sturdevant (1994) 21
Cal.App.4th 904, 915.)
1. Hightimes’ Motion to be Relieve as
Counsel
Discussion
Counsel
has submitted completed MC-051, MC-052, and MC-053 forms. Counsel has provided
a declaration stating Hightimes and counsel have irreconcilable differences. (See Decl. of Kapin.) Counsel has indicated that Hightimes was
served with copies of the motion papers filed with the declaration at Hightimes’
last known address and has confirmed within the past 30 days that the address
is current by mail, return receipt requested.
(See Decl. of Kapin ¶3.)
Conclusion
Hightimes’ counsel’s Motion
to Be Relieved as Counsel is granted.
Counsel will be relieved upon
filing proof of service on their client of the Order Granting Attorney’s Motion
to Be Relieved as Counsel—Civil (Judicial Council form MC-053).
Moving Party to give notice.
2. Trans-High’s Motion to be Relieve as
Counsel
Discussion
Counsel
has submitted completed MC-051, MC-052, and MC-053 forms. Counsel has provided
a declaration stating Trans-High and counsel have irreconcilable differences. (See Decl. of Kapin.) Counsel has indicated that Trans-High was
served with copies of the motion papers filed with the declaration at Trans-High’s
last known address and has confirmed within the past 30 days that the address
is current by mail, return receipt requested.
(See Decl. of Kapin ¶3.)
Conclusion
Trans-High’s counsel’s Motion
to Be Relieved as Counsel is granted.
Counsel will be relieved upon
filing proof of service on their client of the Order Granting Attorney’s Motion
to Be Relieved as Counsel—Civil (Judicial Council form MC-053).
Moving Party to give notice.
Dated: August _____, 2024
|
|
|
Hon.
Daniel M. Crowley |
|
Judge
of the Superior Court |