Judge: Daniel M. Crowley, Case: 23STCV27922, Date: 2025-01-17 Tentative Ruling

        All parties are urged to meet and confer with all parties concerning this tentative ruling to see if they can reach an agreed-upon resolution of their matter.  If you are able to reach an agreement, please notify the courtroom staff in advance of the hearing if you wish to submit on the tentative ruling rather than argue the motion by notifying the court by e-mailing the court at: SMCDEPT71@lacourt.org. Do not click on the email address, either copy and paste it or type it into your email.  Include the word "SUBMITS" in all caps and the Case Number in the Subject line.  In the body of the email, please provide the date and time of the hearing, your name, your contact information, the party you represent, and whether that party is a plaintiff, defendant, cross-complainant, cross-defendant, claimant, intervenor, or non-party, etc.


            Please be advised that if you submit on the tentative and elect not to appear at the hearing, the opposing party may still appear at the hearing and argue the matter, and the court could change its tentative based upon the argument.  Unless you receive a submission from all other parties in the matter, you should assume that others might appear at the hearing to argue.  If you submit, but still intend to appear, include the words "SUBMITS, BUT WILL APPEAR" in the Subject line.    


            If you elect to argue your matter, you are urged to do so remotely, via Court-Connect. If the moving party fails to appear and/or submit to the Court’s tentative ruling, the Court will take the  matter off calendar.
                          
            Note that once the Court has issued a tentative, the Court has the inherent authority not to allow the withdrawal of a motion and to adopt the tentative ruling as the order of the court.   
 

            If you submitted a courtesy copy of your papers containing media (such as a DVD or thumb drive), unless you request the return of the media in your papers, the court will destroy it following the hearing of your matter.   

Case Number: 23STCV27922    Hearing Date: January 17, 2025    Dept: 71

Superior Court of California

County of Los Angeles

 

DEPARTMENT 71

 

TENTATIVE RULING

 

THE CREME SHOP INC., 

 

         vs.

 

SUNNA OLIVE KIM, et al.

 Case No.:  23STCV27922

 

 

 

 Hearing Date:  January 17, 2025

 

The Court considers:

1)    The Crème Shop Inc.’s motion to compel Non-party Toji Co. to comply with a deposition subpoena for the production of business records. 

2)    Plaintiff The Crème Shop Inc.’s motion to compel Non-party Somi Sunday LLC to comply with a deposition subpoena for the production of business records.

3)    Plaintiff The Crème Shop Inc.’s motion to compel Non-party LPF Corp. to comply with a deposition subpoena for the production of business records.

4)    Plaintiff The Crème Shop Inc.’s motion to compel Non-party Pureunbi Corp. to comply with a deposition subpoena for the production of business records.

5)    Plaintiff The Crème Shop Inc.’s motion to compel the production of Paul Kim’s employment records.

6)    Plaintiff The Crème Shop Inc.’s motion to compel the production of Sunna Kim’s employment records.

The Court questions whether each of the third-parties against whom relief is sought was personally served with the motion to compel it to produce documents (California Rule of Court, rule 3.1346), or whether counsel for each third-party waives such service.