Judge: Daniel M. Crowley, Case: 23STCV28008, Date: 2024-10-18 Tentative Ruling
Case Number: 23STCV28008 Hearing Date: October 18, 2024 Dept: 71
County
of Los Angeles
DEPARTMENT 71
TENTATIVE
RULING
NOSSAMAN, LLP,
vs. BRANDABLE VENTURES LLC. |
Case
No.: 23STCV28008 Hearing Date: October 18, 2024 |
Defendant Brandable Ventures,
LLC’s Counsel, Ralph G. Martinez’s, Motion to Be Relieved as Counsel is
denied.
On
November 15, 2023, Plaintiff Nossaman, LLP (“Nossaman”) (“Plaintiff”) filed its
operative Complaint against Defendant Brandable Ventures, LLC (“Brandable”) (“Defendant”).
On
August 13, 2024, Defendant’s counsel, Ralph G. Martinez, of Martinez Law
Office, Inc., filed the instant Motion to be Relieved as Counsel.
Trial
is set for July 21, 2025.
Legal
Standard
California Rule of Court rule 3.1362 (Motion to Be Relieved as Counsel)
requires (1) notice of motion and motion to be directed to the client (made on
the Notice of Motion and Motion to be Relieved as Counsel—Civil form (MC-051));
(2) a declaration stating in general terms and without compromising the
confidentiality of the attorney-client relationship why a motion under Code of
Civil Procedure section 284(2) is brought instead of filing a consent under
Code of Civil Procedure section 284(1) (made on the Declaration in Support of
Attorney’s Motion to Be Relieved as Counsel—Civil form (MC-052)); (3) service
of the notice of motion and motion and declaration on all other parties who
have appeared in the case; and (4) the proposed order relieving counsel
(prepared on the Order Granting Attorney’s Motion to Be Relieved as
Counsel—Civil form (MC-053)).
The court has discretion to allow an attorney to withdraw, and such a
motion should be granted provided that there is no prejudice to the client, and
it does not disrupt the orderly process of justice. (Ramirez v. Sturdevant (1994) 21
Cal.App.4th 904, 915.)
Discussion
Counsel
has submitted completed MC-051 but failed to submit the required MC-052 and MC-053
forms. Counsel has provided a declaration, not on the required MC-052 form,
stating Defendant “has failed to perform several times of the fee agreement”
and such breaches have created a situation in which counsel is unable to
perform his duties to Defendant because of the significant breakdown in
communication and other factors going to the core of the attorney-client
relationship. (See Decl. of Martinez.) Counsel failed to indicate Defendant was
served with copies of the motion papers per C.C.P. §§1013 or 1010.6 and failed
to attach a declaration attesting that the address of service is current. (See Proof of Service.)
Conclusion
Defendant’s counsel’s Motion
to Be Relieved as Counsel is denied.
Moving Party to give notice.
Dated: October _____, 2024
|
Hon.
Daniel M. Crowley |
Judge
of the Superior Court |