Judge: Daniel M. Crowley, Case: 23STCV35738, Date: 2023-08-16 Tentative Ruling
Case Number: 23STCV35738 Hearing Date: August 16, 2023 Dept: 71
Superior
Court of California
County
of Los Angeles
DEPARTMENT 71
TENTATIVE
RULING
XCHANGE LOGISTICS CORPORATION,
vs. HK LOGISTICS CORP, et al. |
Case No.:
23STCV02892 Hearing Date: August 16, 2023 |
Defendant HK Trans LLC’s Counsel,
Ira N. Katz’s, Motion to Be Relieved as Counsel is granted.
Defendant Miguel Angel Roque
II’s Counsel, Ira N. Katz’s, Motion to Be Relieved as Counsel is granted.
Defendant HK Logistics Corp’s
Counsel, Ira N. Katz’s, Motion to Be Relieved as Counsel is granted.
On February 9, 2023,
Plaintiff Xchange Logistics Corporation (“Xchange”) (“Plaintiff”) filed this
action against Defendants HK Logistics Corp (“HK Corp”) and Miguel
Angel Roque II (“Roque”) for conversion, breach of contract, negligence,
intentional interference with contractual relations, violation of Business and
Professions Code §17200, and common count: money had and received. On April 14, 2023, Plaintiff amended its
complaint by substituting Doe 1 to be HK Trans LLC’s (“HK LLC”).
On August 3, 2023, Defendants
HK
LLC’s, Roque’s, and HK Corp’s (collectively, “Defendants”) counsel,
Ira N. Katz, filed Motions to be Relieved as Counsel.
Trial is set for June 17,
2024.
Legal
Standard
California Rule of Court rule 3.1362 (Motion to Be Relieved as Counsel)
requires (1) notice of motion and motion to be directed to the client (made on
the Notice of Motion and Motion to be Relieved as Counsel—Civil form (MC-051));
(2) a declaration stating in general terms and without compromising the
confidentiality of the attorney-client relationship why a motion under Code of
Civil Procedure section 284(2) is brought instead of filing a consent under
Code of Civil Procedure section 284(1) (made on the Declaration in Support of
Attorney’s Motion to Be Relieved as Counsel—Civil form (MC-052)); (3) service
of the notice of motion and motion and declaration on all other parties who
have appeared in the case; and (4) the proposed order relieving counsel
(prepared on the Order Granting Attorney’s Motion to Be Relieved as
Counsel—Civil form (MC-053)).
The court has discretion to allow an attorney to withdraw, and such a
motion should be granted provided that there is no prejudice to the client, and
it does not disrupt the orderly process of justice. (Ramirez v. Sturdevant (1994) 21
Cal.App.4th 904, 915.)
Discussion
Counsel
has submitted completed MC-051, MC-052 and MC-053 forms. Counsel has provided
declarations stating communications between him and Defendants have broken down. Counsel has indicated that Defendants were served
by mail at their last known addresses with copies of the motion papers, and
Counsel confirmed within the past 30 days of filing his motion that the
addresses are current via telephone and by email.
Conclusion
Defendants HK LLC’s, HK
Corp’s, and Roque’s Counsel’s Motion to Be Relieved as Counsel is
granted.
Counsel is ordered to give
notice of this ruling.
Counsel is ordered to file
the proofs of service of this ruling with the Court within five days.
HK Trans LL v. Xchange
Logistics 23NWCV01342 ex parte to Specially Set Hearing On Motion To Be
Relieved as Counsel
The Court will hear the
matter on August 22, 2023, at 8:30.
Moving party is to give personal or e-notice by August 17, 2023.
Moving party is to give
notice of this ruling.
Dated: August _____, 2023
|
Hon.
Daniel M. Crowley |
Judge
of the Superior Court |