Judge: Daniel M. Crowley, Case: 23STUD05234, Date: 2023-12-20 Tentative Ruling
Case Number: 23STUD05234 Hearing Date: December 20, 2023 Dept: 71
County of Los
Angeles
DEPARTMENT 71
TENTATIVE
RULING
|
COMMERCE COMMONS MANAGEMENT, LLC.
vs. ODIN SPEED SHOP CORPORATION. |
Case No.:
23STUD05234 Hearing Date: December 20, 2023 |
Defendant Armando Corral’s Counsel, Ami Meyers’, Motion to
Be Relieved as Counsel is granted.
On May 9, 2023, Plaintiff Commerce Commons Management (“Commerce
Commons”) (“Plaintiff”) filed its initial complaint against Defendant Odin
Speed Shop Corporation (“Odin”) (“Defendant”) for unlawful detainer. On May 17, 2023, Plaintiff filed the
operative first amended complaint (“FAC”) against Odin and Defendant Armando
Corral (“Corral”) (collectively, “Defendants”) for breach of lease and breach
of guaranty. On July 31, 2023, Defendants
filed their Answer.
On November 13, 2023, Corral’s Counsel, Ami Meyers, filed
the instant Motion to be Relieved as Counsel.
Trial is set for November 25, 2024.
Legal Standard
California Rule of Court rule 3.1362 (Motion to Be
Relieved as Counsel) requires (1) notice of motion and motion to be directed to
the client (made on the Notice of Motion and Motion to be Relieved as
Counsel—Civil form (MC-051)); (2) a declaration stating in general terms and
without compromising the confidentiality of the attorney-client relationship
why a motion under Code of Civil Procedure section 284(2) is brought instead of
filing a consent under Code of Civil Procedure section 284(1) (made on the Declaration
in Support of Attorney’s Motion to Be Relieved as Counsel—Civil form (MC-052));
(3) service of the notice of motion and motion and declaration on all other
parties who have appeared in the case; and (4) the proposed order relieving
counsel (prepared on the Order Granting Attorney’s Motion to Be Relieved as
Counsel—Civil form (MC-053)).
The court has discretion to allow an attorney to
withdraw, and such a motion should be granted provided that there is no
prejudice to the client, and it does not disrupt the orderly process of
justice. (Ramirez v. Sturdevant (1994)
21 Cal.App.4th 904, 915.)
Discussion
Counsel has submitted completed MC-051, MC-052 and MC-053
forms. Counsel has provided a declaration stating Corral has breached his
contractual obligation to remain in communication with counsel, and has been
arrested for felonies, and upon posting bail, he has fled and has not provided means
of contacting the client. (See
Decl. of Meyers.) Counsel has indicated
that Corral was served with copies of the motion papers filed with the
declaration at Corral’s last known address and has been unable to confirm that
the address is current or to locate a more current address for the client after
calling the client’s last known telephone number; contacting Corral’s attorney
in a personal injury case, Corral’s sister, Corral’s wife/ex-wife, and Corral’s
neighbor; visiting Corral’s home on November 12, 2023, around 4:15 PM and
ringing the doorbell to which no one answered; and emailing the motion papers
to Corral’s email, which was last confirmed via email by Corral on October 12,
2023.
Conclusion
Corral’s Counsel’s Motion to Be Relieved as Counsel is
granted.
Counsel will be relieved upon filing proof of service on
their client of the Order Granting Attorney’s Motion to Be Relieved as
Counsel—Civil (Judicial Council form MC-053).
Moving Party to give notice.
Dated: December _____, 2023
|
|
|
Hon. Daniel M. Crowley |
|
Judge of the Superior Court |