Judge: Daniel M. Crowley, Case: BC712633, Date: 2023-03-14 Tentative Ruling
Case Number: BC712633 Hearing Date: March 14, 2023 Dept: 28
Plaintiff Interinsurance Exchange of
the Automobile Club’s Motion to Vacate Court Order
Having considered the moving papers,
the Court rules as follows.
BACKGROUND
On
July 3, 2018, Plaintiff Interinsurance Exchange of the Automobile Club
(“Plaintiff”) filed this action against Defendants Lauricia Lorraine Bustamante
(“Bustamante”) and Wendy Michelle Perez (“Perez”) for subrogation.
On
September 14, 2018, Perez filed an answer. On December 17, 2019, the Court
dismissed Perez, without prejudice, pursuant to Plaintiff’s request.
On
December 3, 2019, the clerk entered default against Bustamante. The Court
granted the application for default judgment on September 23, 2020. Default was
later vacated on June 13, 2022.
On January 30, 2023, Plaintiff filed
a Motion to Vacate Order to be heard on March 9, 2023. The Court continued the
hearing on the motion to March 14, 2023.
Trial
is currently set for October 27, 2023.
PARTY’S REQUESTS
Plaintiff
requests the Court vacate the previous Court order.
LEGAL
STANDARD
“Section
473(b) provides for both discretionary and mandatory relief. [Citation.]”
(Pagnini v. Union Bank, N.A. (2018) 28 Cal.App.5th 298,
302.) The discretionary provision grants
relief based upon a party or legal representative’s mistake, inadvertence,
surprise, or neglect. The discretionary
provision states in pertinent part:
“The court may, upon any terms as may be
just, relieve a party or his or her legal representative from a judgment,
dismissal, order, or other proceeding taken against him or her through his or
her mistake, inadvertence, surprise, or excusable neglect. Application for this
relief shall be accompanied by a copy of the answer or other pleading proposed
to be filed therein, otherwise the application shall not be granted, and shall
be made within a reasonable time, in no case exceeding six months, after the judgment,
dismissal, order, or proceeding was taken.”
The mandatory provision states in pertinent
part:
“Notwithstanding any other requirements of
this section, the court shall, whenever an application for relief is made no
more than six months after entry of judgment, is in proper form, and is
accompanied by an attorney’s sworn affidavit attesting to his or her mistake,
inadvertence, surprise, or neglect, vacate any (1) resulting default entered by
the clerk against his or her client, and which will result in entry of a
default judgment, or (2) resulting default judgment or dismissal entered
against his or her client, unless the court finds that the default or dismissal
was not in fact caused by the attorney’s mistake, inadvertence, surprise, or
neglect. The court shall, whenever relief is granted based on an attorney’s
affidavit of fault, direct the attorney to pay reasonable compensatory legal
fees and costs to opposing counsel or parties.”
“The
purpose of this mandatory relief provision is to alleviate the hardship on
parties who lose their day in court due to an inexcusable failure to act
by their attorneys. [Citation.]” (Rodriguez v. Brill (2015) 234
Cal.App.4th 715, 723, emphasis added.)
DISCUSSION
Plaintiff’s
application was filed within 6 months of the order.
The
Court previously granted a continuance, pursuant to Defendant’s request, to
continue trial to October 2023. Plaintiff’s counsel alleges they were not on
notice as to the motion or to the ruling until approximately one month after
the ruling. The granted continuance exceeds CCP §583.310’s mandatory 5-year
rule, as this case was originally filed in July of 2018.
The
Court finds good cause to grant the motion. The Court vacates the current trial
date and sets a new trial date.
CONCLUSION
Plaintiff
Interinsurance Exchange of the
Automobile Club’s Motion to Vacate Court Order is GRANTED. The current
trial date and final status conference are vacated. Trial is set for June 15,
2023, at 8:30 a.m. in Department 28 of the Spring Street Court House. The Final
Status Conference is set for June 1, 2023, at 10:00 a.m. in Department 28 of
the Spring Street Court House.
Moving
party is ordered to give notice of this ruling.
Moving Party is ordered to file the proof of service of this
ruling with the Court within five days.
The parties are directed to the header of this
tentative ruling for further instructions.