Judge: Daniel S. Murphy, Case: 20STCV42255, Date: 2023-02-22 Tentative Ruling
Case Number: 20STCV42255 Hearing Date: February 22, 2023 Dept: 32
|
JASON CASASOLA, Plaintiff, v. CHLOE’S APARTMENTS, LLC,
et al., Defendants. |
Case No.: 20STCV42255 Hearing Date: February 22, 2023 [TENTATIVE]
order RE: defendants’ motion to compel deposition |
|
|
|
BACKGROUND
On November 4, 2020, Plaintiff Jason
Casasola filed this action against Defendants Chloe’s Apartments, LLC,
Apartment Management Group, LLC, Adrian Malin, and Dan Zuckerman, asserting
thirteen causes of action stemming from alleged uninhabitable conditions.
Plaintiff’s deposition was set for
December 2, 2022, but Plaintiff did not appear. On January 25, 2023, Defendants
Chloe’s Apartments, LLC and Apartment Management Group, LLC filed the instant
motion to compel Plaintiff’s deposition. Plaintiff has not filed an opposition.
LEGAL STANDARD
“If, after service of a deposition notice,
a party to the action or an officer, director, managing agent, or employee of a
party, or a person designated by an organization that is a party under Section
2025.230, without having served a valid objection under Section 2025.410, fails
to appear for examination, or to proceed with it, or to produce for inspection
any document … described in the deposition notice, the party giving the notice
may move for an order compelling the deponent’s attendance and testimony, and
the production for inspection of any document … described in the deposition
notice.” (Code Civ. Proc., § 2025.450, subd. (a).)
DISCUSSION
After some delay due to Plaintiff’s
unavailability, Plaintiff’s counsel and defense counsel eventually agreed to
take Plaintiff’s deposition on December 2, 2022, and Defendant served a
deposition notice to that effect. (Carpenter Decl. ¶¶ 5-6.) Plaintiff failed to
appear on December 2, 2022, although his attorney appeared. (Id., ¶ 7.) Further
attempts to reschedule the deposition have been unsuccessful. (Id., ¶ 8.)
There is no dispute as to Defendants’
right to depose Plaintiff, nor any conflict regarding the scope of examination.
No justification has been provided for Plaintiff’s failure to appear. Accordingly,
sanctions are warranted. Defendants reasonably request $810. (See Carpenter
Decl. ¶ 9.)
CONCLUSION
Defendants’ motion to compel deposition
is GRANTED. Plaintiff is to appear for deposition within 10 days. Sanctions are
awarded against Plaintiff in the amount of $810, to be paid within 30 days.