Judge: Daniel S. Murphy, Case: 21STCV14989, Date: 2023-02-24 Tentative Ruling
Case Number: 21STCV14989 Hearing Date: February 24, 2023 Dept: 32
|
AUTHENTITECH, LLC, Plaintiff, v. AMERICAN WELLNESS, LLC,
Defendant.
|
Case No.: 21STCV14989 Hearing Date: February 24, 2023 [TENTATIVE]
order RE: plaintiff’s motions to compel deposition
|
|
|
|
BACKGROUND
On April 20, 2021, Plaintiff
Authentitech, LLC filed this action against American Wellness, LLC for breach
of contract. Plaintiff alleges that it formed an agreement with Defendant for the
purchase of nitrile gloves. Defendant allegedly failed to deliver the gloves
despite Plaintiff’s payment of $8.3 million. Default was entered against
Defendant on September 14, 2021.
On December 19, 2022, Plaintiff
filed the instant two motions to compel the depositions of Wallace Shimabukuro
and the person most knowledgeable of M&W Suppliers pursuant to third-party subpoenas.
No opposition has been filed.
LEGAL STANDARD
“If a subpoena requires the attendance of
a witness or the production of books, documents, electronically stored information,
or other things …, the court, upon motion reasonably made by [a party] . . . may
make an order quashing the subpoena entirely, modifying it, or directing compliance
with it upon those terms or conditions as the court shall declare, including
protective orders.” (Code Civ. Proc., § 1987.1, subd. (a), (b).)
DISCUSSION
Through the deposition subpoenas,
Plaintiff seeks “to obtain information concerning the sale of the gloves and
what happened to the $8,398,000 payment made by Plaintiff to M&W” and/or
Shimabukuro. Shimabukuro appeared for deposition as the PMK for M&W on July
13, 2022, but numerous documents were not produced, and counsel for Shimabukuro
and M&W agreed to have Shimabukuro appear for deposition again after
additional documents were produced. On September 19, 2022, counsel for M&W
notified Plaintiff that they no longer represented M&W or Shimabukuro.
Thereafter, Plaintiff followed up with Shimabukuro and M&W directly to
schedule a deposition but received no response. On October 31, 2022, Plaintiff
issued the subject subpoenas to Shimabukuro and M&W. Neither Shimabukuro
nor M&W’s PMK appeared for deposition on the scheduled dates.
Given the lack of opposition, there
is no dispute as to good cause for the depositions nor any dispute as to the
scope of inquiry. No justification is provided for the deponents’ failure to
appear. Therefore, Plaintiff is entitled to an order enforcing the subpoenas,
and sanctions are warranted. Given the simplicity of the motions and the fact
that both motions are substantively identical, Plaintiff’s counsel could not
have reasonably spent more than 2 hours related to the motions. At a rate of
$450 per hour and adding $120 in filing fees, this amounts to $1,080.
Lastly, the Court notes that it is
perplexing why discovery is necessary when a default has been entered against
the only named defendant in this case.
CONCLUSION
Plaintiff’s motions to compel deposition
are GRANTED. Wallace Shimabukuro and/or the PMK for M&W Suppliers is to
appear for deposition within 10 days. Sanctions are awarded against Shimabukuro
and M&W in the amount of $1,080, to be paid within 30 days.