Judge: Daniel S. Murphy, Case: 21STCV44115, Date: 2023-03-17 Tentative Ruling
Case Number: 21STCV44115 Hearing Date: March 17, 2023 Dept: 32
|
GREGORY KINGSTON, et
al., Plaintiffs, v. THE ESTATE OF ROBERT
BLAISCH, et al., Defendants.
|
Case No.: 21STCV44115 Hearing Date: March 17, 2023 [TENTATIVE]
order RE: defendant state farm insurance company’s
motions to compel discovery (CRS # 5136, 8435, 1855, 5782, 3313.) |
|
|
|
BACKGROUND
On December 3, 2021, Plaintiffs Gregory
Kingston, Paul Kingston, Gail Kingston, and Victoria Kingston-Allen filed this
action against Defendants The Estate of Robert Blaisch, The Estate of Kenneth
Eldon, and State Farm Insurance Company. The operative First Amended Complaint,
filed July 25, 2022, alleges (1) personal injury and property damage, (2)
breach of contract, (3) breach of the implied covenant of good faith and fair
dealing, and (4) bad faith denial of insurance coverage.
Plaintiffs owned a duplex in Los
Angeles, in which Robert Blaisch and Kenneth Eldon were tenants. The duplex
burned down in a fire due to the alleged negligence of Blaisch and Eldon, who
perished in the fire. Plaintiffs bring the first cause of action for personal
and property damage against the estates of Blaisch and Eldon. Plaintiffs bring
the second through fourth causes of action against State Farm for denying insurance
coverage after the fire.
On February 7, 2023, State Farm
filed the instant five motions with regards to the following discovery: (1) RFA
Set One to Victoria Kingston-Allen (CRS # 5136); (2) RFA Set One to Gail
Kingston (CRS # 8435); (3) RFP Set One to Gail Kingston (CRS # 1855); (4) FROG
Set One to Gail Kingston (CRS # 5782); and (5) FROG Set One to Gregory Kingston
(CRS # 3313). State Farm seeks an order compelling responses to the RFPs and
FROGs, and an order deeming the RFAs admitted.
LEGAL STANDARD
Discovery responses are due 30 days
after service of the requests, unless the parties stipulate or the court orders
otherwise. (Code Civ. Proc., §§ 2030.260(a), 2031.260(a), 2033.250(a).) If a responding
party fails to respond in time, the propounding party may move for an order
compelling the responses or deeming matters admitted. (Id., §§
2030.290(b), 2031.300(b), 2033.280(b).)
DISCUSSION
The subject discovery was served on
October 26, 2022. (McKeon Decl. ¶ 3.) Plaintiffs did not respond within 30 days
and did not respond to State Farm’s follow-up communications. (Id., ¶¶
5-6.) Therefore, Plaintiffs have failed their discovery obligations and have
provided no substantial justification.
Sanctions would be warranted, but
State Farm’s counsel does not provide any substantiating evidence in her
declarations in support of the motions, namely her hourly rate and hours spent.
CONCLUSION
Defendant State Farm’s motions are
GRANTED. Plaintiffs Gregory Kingston and Gail Kingston are ordered to provide
responses to the subject RFPs and FROGs within 10 days. The matters in RFAs Set
One propounded to Victoria Kingston-Allen and Gail Kingston are deemed admitted.
State Farm’s request for sanctions is denied.