Judge: Daniel S. Murphy, Case: 22STCV39001, Date: 2023-01-20 Tentative Ruling
Case Number: 22STCV39001 Hearing Date: January 20, 2023 Dept: 32
|
R. MICHAEL COLLUM, et
al., Plaintiffs, v. DOES 1 THROUGH 25, Defendants. |
Case No.: 22STCV39001 Hearing Date: January 20, 2023 [TENTATIVE]
order RE: plaintiffs’ motion for early discovery |
|
|
|
BACKGROUND
On December 15, 2022, Plaintiffs R.
Michael Collum, Ryan D. Grady, Michael Collum, APC, and Ryan Grady, LCSW filed
this defamation action against Does 1 through 25. The lawsuit arises from
anonymous postings on various websites, purporting to be customer reviews,
allegedly containing false assertions of fact regarding negative experiences
with Plaintiffs and their law firms.
On December 28, 2022, Plaintiffs
filed the instant motion for early discovery to serve subpoenas for business
records upon Yelp, Inc., Google, Inc., Microsoft, Inc., MH Sub I, LLC, and the
internet service providers (ISPs) of the Doe defendants.
LEGAL STANDARD
“The plaintiff may serve a deposition
notice without leave of court on any date that is 20 days after the service of
the summons on, or appearance by, any defendant. On motion with or without
notice, the court, for good cause shown, may grant to a plaintiff leave to
serve a deposition notice on an earlier date.” (Code Civ. Proc., § 2025.210(b).)
DISCUSSION
Because Plaintiffs do not yet know
the identities of the Doe defendants, no defendant has been served or appeared
in this action. “Not having yet named any defendant, and a fortiori having
served none, [Plaintiffs] need[] leave of court before [they] could propound
discovery . . . .” (O'Grady v. Superior Court (2006) 139 Cal.App.4th
1423, 1454.) Under these circumstances, there is good cause to allow Plaintiffs
to subpoena the listed entities.
However, the Court makes no findings
regarding the merits of any discovery request, and the recipients of any
discovery requests retain the right to object to them.
CONCLUSION
Plaintiffs’ motion for leave to
conduct early discovery is GRANTED.