Judge: Daniel S. Murphy, Case: 23STCV00726, Date: 2023-04-26 Tentative Ruling
Case Number: 23STCV00726 Hearing Date: April 26, 2023 Dept: 32
|
KITE ISAAC FINDS THE
FEATHER, et al., Plaintiffs, v. WILLIAM UTNEHMER, et
al., Defendants.
|
Case No.: 23STCV00726 Hearing Date: April 26, 2023 [TENTATIVE]
order RE: defendants’ motions to change venue |
|
|
|
BACKGROUND
On January 12, 2023, Plaintiffs Kite
Isaac Finds the Feather and Jooblay, Inc. filed this legal malpractice action
against various defendants. On March 20, 2023, Defendants William Utnehmer and Edward
Sanchez filed identical motions to change venue to Mendocino County. Plaintiffs
have not filed an opposition.
LEGAL STANDARD
“Subject to the power of the court to
transfer actions and proceedings as provided in this title, the superior court
in the county where the real property that is the subject of the action, or
some part thereof, is situated, is the proper court for the trial of the
following actions: (1) For the recovery of real property, or of an estate
or interest therein, or for the determination in any form, of that right or
interest, and for injuries to real property.” (Code Civ. Proc., § 392(a).) Upon
motion, “the court shall, if it appears that the action or proceeding was not
commenced in the proper court, order the action or proceeding transferred to
the proper court.” (Id., § 396b(a).)
DISCUSSION
The complaint concerns an interest in
or injury to real property because it alleges that as a result of Defendants’
malpractice, Plaintiffs lost various parcels of real property. (See Compl. ¶
17.) One of these properties is in Mendocino County, but none are in Los
Angeles County. (Ibid.) Therefore, by operation of statute, Mendocino County
is the proper venue for the action. (See Code Civ. Proc., § 392(a).) None of
the parties or properties are located in Los Angeles. The complaint does not
even contain any allegations mentioning Los Angeles. Plaintiffs do not oppose
the motion and therefore concede that the action should be tried in Mendocino
County.
CONCLUSION
Defendants’ motions to transfer
venue to Mendocino County are GRANTED. Plaintiffs shall bear the costs of the
transfer. (See Code Civ. Proc., § 399(a).)