Judge: Daniel S. Murphy, Case: BC400440, Date: 2022-08-19 Tentative Ruling
Case Number: BC400440 Hearing Date: August 19, 2022 Dept: 32
|
JUDY THOMAS, Plaintiff, v. GARY E. PALMQUIST et
al., Defendants.
|
Case No.: BC400440 Hearing Date: August 19, 2022 [TENTATIVE]
order RE: claim of exemption |
|
|
|
BACKGROUND
Around late June 2022, Plaintiff and
judgment creditor Judy Thomas levied monies from an account belonging to
Defendant and judgment debtor Gary Palmquist. Around July 1, 2022, Defendant executed
a claim of exemption on the grounds that the levied money is from an
IRA/retirement account and social security, and is required for living
necessities. (Evanns Decl., Ex. A1.) On July 25, 2022, Plaintiff filed her
opposition to the claim of exemption. Defendant has not filed a response to
Plaintiff’s opposition and notice of hearing.
LEGAL STANDARD
Code of Civil Procedure section 703.010
et seq. sets forth the grounds for exemptions to enforcement of a money
judgment. The burden of proof is on the party claiming the exemption. (Id.,
§ 703.580, subd. (b).)
DISCUSSION
Although Defendant filed a claim of
exemption, no effort has been made to substantiate the representations made
therein. Defendant bears the burden of proof. (Code Civ. Proc., § 703.580, subd.
(b).) Having filed no response to Plaintiff’s opposition, Defendant has failed
to meet his burden of proof.
Moreover, documents received in
August 2022 pursuant to subpoenas served on Defendant’s banks show that Defendant
received monthly income significantly higher than what he averred to in the
claim of exemption. (See Evanns Supp. Decl., Ex. F-I.) None of the amounts deposited
in the months of March through June 2022 match the purported $750 per month
distribution from IRA.
In sum, there is no evidence that the
funds are exempt from levy.
CONCLUSION
Therefore, the claim of exemption
filed by Defendant Gary Palmquist is DENIED.