Judge: David B. Gelfound, Case: 22STCV23442, Date: 2025-01-21 Tentative Ruling

Case Number: 22STCV23442    Hearing Date: January 21, 2025    Dept: F49

Dept. F49

Date: 1/21/25

Case Name: Krystal Shin, by and through guardian ad litem You Sun Jang v. City of Los Angeles, and Does 1 through 20

Case No. 22STCV23442

 

LOS ANGELES SUPERIOR COURT

NORTH VALLEY DISTRICT

DEPARTMENT F49

 

JANUARY 21, 2025

 

PETITION FOR APPROVAL OF COMPROMISE OF CLAIM FOR MINOR

Los Angeles Superior Court Case No. 22STCV23442

Petition filed: 12/20/24

MOVING PARTY: Plaintiff and Petitioner You Sun Jang

RESPONDING PARTY: None.

NOTICE: OK.

RELIEF REQUESTED: Petitioner You Sun Jang seeks the Court’s approval of the settlement that their minor daughter, Plaintiff and claimant, Krystal Shin, reached with Defendants City of Los Angeles, PlayCore Wisconsin, Inc., and Evergreen Environment, Inc.

TENTATIVE RULING: The petition is CONTINUED.

BACKGROUND

This action arises from a personal injury sustained by the minor Plaintiff Krystal Shin (“Plaintiff” or “Shin”) that occurred on February 20, 2022, allegedly caused by the playground equipment located at a Los Angeles City Community Park, 11075 Foothill Boulevard in Lake View Terrace, California, 91432 (the “Park”).

 

On July 20, 2022, Plaintiff, by and through her guardian ad litem, You Sun Jang, initiated the present action against Defendants City of Los Angeles (“City”) and Does 1 through 20. The Complaint alleges the following causes of action: (1) dangerous condition of public property, (2) negligence, and (3) strict liability. Subsequently, on September 16, 2022, Defendant City filed its Answer to the Complaint.

 

On the same day, September 16, 2022, Defendant City filed its Cross-Complaint against Roes 1 to 20, alleging (1) apportionment of fault, (2) declaratory relief, and (3) indemnification.

 

On February 8, 2023, Plaintiff filed her Amendment to Complaint, substituting Defendant PlayCore Wisconsin, Inc. (“PlayCore”) for Doe 1. Subsequently, on March 13, 2023, Defendant PlayCore filed its Answer to the Complaint.

 

            On November 28, 2023, Plaintiff filed another Amendment to Complaint, substituting Defendant Evergreen Environment Inc. (“Evergreen”) for Doe 2. Subsequently, on February 28, 2024, Defendant Evergreen filed its Answer to the Complaint.

 

            On December 20, 2024, Plaintiff filed the instant Petition for Approval of Compromise of Claim for Minor (the “Petition”).

 

            No Opposition papers have been received by the Court.

 

ANALYSIS

 

A.    Petition to Approval of Minor’s Compromise

 

Rule/Requirement/Component 

Application 

Comments 

Claimant (minor)

Krystal Shin

DOB:1/9/19, age: 6

Guardian ad litem 

You Sun Jang

Parent 

Settlement (Total) 

$405,000.00 (MC-350 ¶ 10a)  

 

Injuries 

“Plaintiff sustained a crushing injury to the left middle finger involving a displaced fracture of the distal phalanx with laceration and damage to the nail bed.” (MC-350 ¶ 6)

 

Medical treatment received? 

(1)   USC Verdugo Hills Urgent Care,

(2)   Surgical repair of the laceration and nail bed injury, and reduction of the displaced distal phalanx fracture at the Children’s Hospital of Los Angeles.

(MC-350 ¶ 7, Attach. 7.) 

 

Completely healed of injuries? 

Yes (MC-350 ¶ 8a) 

 

Medical Expenses Incurred (Total) 

$69,733.88 (MC-350 ¶ 12a(1)) 

Numbers are not balanced.

Medical Bills (Documentation) 

No. (MC-350, Attach. 7 is not included.)

 

Outstanding medical payments owed from proceeds 

$2,216.49 (MC-350 ¶ 12a(4)) 

Provider Liens (Documentation) 

$2,216.49 (MC-350 Attach. 12b(4)(c))

Negotiated Lien Reductions? 

$ 2,913.41 (MC-350 ¶ 12a(3)) 

 

Documentation of lien reductions 

Information is provided in MC-350 ¶ 12b(4)(c)

 

Attorney Fees 

$162,000.00 (40% of $405,000.00) (MC-350 ¶ 13a) 

The Court finds the amount for attorney’s fees is reasonable.

Declaration of fees and copy of retainer (Cal. Rules Court, rule 7.955(b).) 

Yes. (MC-350 Attach. 13(a), 17(a))

 40% of claimant’s recovery.

Copy of Retainer is included. (MC-350 Attach. 17(a))

Litigation Costs 

$12,406.36 (MC-350 ¶ 16e)

Including $ $4,998.75 medical expert fees, and $3,562.50 mediation fees, etc. 

Are the costs itemized and reasonable? 

Yes. (MC-350 ¶ 13b)

Total to be paid to minor 

$228,377.13 (MC-350 ¶ 15) 

 

Blocked account? 

No. (MC-350 ¶ 18b MC-351 ¶ 8b(2))

“$228,377.15 will be invested in a single premium deferred payment annuity.” 

Upon age of maturity Krystal Shin may withdraw the entire accumulated value available from the annuity. (MC-350, “Minor’s Compromise Addendum”) 

Proposed order to approve compromise is congruent with Petition? 

No.

Under paragraph 8.a.(5) of the Proposed Order form MC-351 “Total allowance for fees and expenses from the settlement,” it contains an error.

Proposed order to deposit funds is congruent with Petition? 

n/a 

Disposition 

REVIEW/CONTINUE 

 

Upon reviewing the Petition, the Court has identified the following deficiencies:

 

(1)   Balancing of Amounts in Paragraph 12a:

 

The “total medical expenses before any reductions” is reported as $69,733.88 (MC-350 ¶ 12(a)(1)).

 

The “total medical expenses paid (include payments by private insurance, Medi-Cal, or Medicare)” is $5,130.00 (id. ¶ 12(a)(2).)

 

The $5,130.00 in paid medical expenses was covered by Medi-Cal, which has agreed to accept reimbursement in the amount of $2,216.49 in full satisfaction of its lien rights, resulting in a reduction of $2,913.51. (MC-350, 12b(4).)

 

However, after deducting the $2,216.49 for Medi-Cal reimbursement from the proceeds, there remains an unexplained unpaid balance of $64,603.88 ($69,733.88-$2,913.51 -$2,216.49 = $64,603.88).

 

This description is not addressed in the Petition and requires clarification.

 

(2)   Incorrect Amount on the Proposed Order (MC-351)

 

Under paragraph 8a of the MC-351 form, Petitioner appears to have entered an incorrect amount for “Total allowance for fees and expenses from the settlement.” (MC-351 ¶ 8a(5).)

 

Accordingly, the Court requires supplemental information and amended petition papers to address these deficiencies. A ruling will be issued after Petitioner has had an opportunity to correct the issues identified above.

 

CONCLUSION

 

Petitioner You Sun Jang’s Petition for Approval of Compromise of Claim for Minor Krystal Shin is CONTINUED to allow for the submission of additional information or corrections.

 

Moving party to give notice.