Judge: David S. Cunningham, Case: 19STCV33514, Date: 2022-09-09 Tentative Ruling
Case Number: 19STCV33514 Hearing Date: September 9, 2022 Dept: 11
Final Approval of
Class Action Settlement
Department SSC-11
BRYSON
v. MADAME TUSSAUDS HOLLYWOOD, LLC, et al. (Case No: 19STCV33514)
Hearing
Date: September 9, 2022
TENTATIVE RULING
In reviewing your
motion for final approval of class action settlement, the Court orders further
briefing as to the items discussed below.
All filings in
response to this ruling must be submitted 16 court days before the next final approval
hearing date.
Your hearing date
set for ______________, is continued to the first available date of __________ at _____ in Department 11.
The escalator clause at Settlement Agreement ¶3.04.g
triggers if the final number of workweeks exceeds 20,027, based on Defendants’
representation that there were approximately 19,073 total workweeks at the time
the parties executed their Memorandum of Understanding. In other words, the
clause triggers upon an approximate 5% increase in the workweek total.
At final approval, the administrator states that there
are 422 Class Members (Quiroz Decl. ¶5), which is a 23.7% class size increase from the estimate of 341
class members provided at preliminary approval (Hawkins Decl. ISO Prelim ¶61.)
However, the final number of workweeks was not provided
to the Court, nor any information as to whether the number increased. Further,
there is no indication that the settlement amount was increased in any way
based on the number of class members. Based on the increased class size,
counsel and/or the administrator need to provide the following information:
·
Did the workweeks increase based on the
increased class size? What is the final number?
·
If the workweeks increased to the point of
triggering the escalator clause, and the settlement amount was not increased,
why is this proper? Why is the settlement amount still adequate and reasonable
to the class?
Date: ___________, 2022
_____________________________
JUDICIAL
OFFICER