Judge: David Sotelo, Case: 22STCP02751, Date: 2022-09-26 Tentative Ruling
Case Number: 22STCP02751 Hearing Date: September 26, 2022 Dept: 40
MOVING PARTY: Petitioner
Estate Fund, LLC.
Estate
Fund, LLC, Petitions for this Un-Opposed Approval of Transfer of Structured
Settlement Payment Rights as to payee Z.R. (“Payee”).
The Court
continues Petitioner’s Petition to provide Petitioner an opportunity to serve
the Petition and Notice of hearing of the Petition on Payee and the Attorney
General.
California Insurance Code section 10139.5 provides that a
transfer of structured settlement payment rights is not effective unless the
transfer has been approved in advance in a final court order based on the
following express findings by the court that:
When determining whether the proposed transfer should be
approved, including whether the transfer is fair, reasonable, and in the
payee’s best interest, the court shall consider the totality of the
circumstances, including, but not limited to: (1) the reasonable preference and
desire of the payee to complete the proposed transaction, taking into account
the payee’s age, mental capacity, legal knowledge, and apparent maturity level;
(2) the stated purpose of the transfer; (3) the payee’s financial and economic
situation; (4) the terms of the transaction, including whether the payee is
transferring monthly or lump sum payments or all or a portion of his or her
future payments; (5) whether the future periodic payments were intended to pay
for future medical care of the payee related to the incident that was the
subject of the settlement; (6) whether the payee has other means of income or
support sufficient to meet the payee’s future financial obligations for support
of payee’s dependents, such as child support; (7) whether there were previous
transactions involving payee’s structured settlement payments; and (8) whether
the payee and his or her dependents are facing a hardship situation. (Ins. Code
§ 10139.5(b).)
Procedurally, Insurance Code section 10136 provides that ten
or more days before the payee executes a transfer agreement, the transferee
shall provide the payee with a separate written disclosure statement,
accurately completed with the information that applies to the transfer
agreement in at least 12-point type. (Ins. Code § 10136(b))
The court-approval process requires the transferee to file a
petition in the county in which the transferor resides for approval of the
transfer. (Ins. Code § 10139.5(f)(1)) The following are required to be
served and filed not less than 20 days prior to the scheduled hearing on any
application for approval of a transfer of structured settlement payment
rights:
Further, at the time of filing such a petition, the
transferee shall file a copy of the petition with the California Attorney
General. Ins. Code § 10139. The Court, of course, retains continuing
jurisdiction to interpret and monitor the implementation of the transfer
agreement as justice requires. (Ins. Code § 10139.5(i))
Here,
Payee is the recipient of certain structured settlement payment (from the
settlement of a wrongful death claim) under which the payment obligor (“PO”)
purchased an annuity contract from payment issuer (“PI”) to fund the aforesaid
obligation pursuant to a structured settlement agreement. (Pet. ¶ 2.)
Payee has entered into a transfer agreement (“Transfer Agreement”) to
transfer the remaining structured settlement payments to Petitioner or its
assignee (“Transferred Payments”). (Pet.
¶ 3, Exh. A; Exh. C, Z.R. Decl., ¶ 11 .)
Payee has agreed to sell his interest in the remaining payments to pay off
his mortgage and complete needed home repairs and renovations. Payee is over eighteen years of age. (Pet. Exh. C., Z.R. Decl., ¶ 1.) The original settlement was not intended for
compensation for physical injuries, and Payee does not have a continuing need
to provide for medical expenses. (Id.
at ¶ 6.) Payee does not have child
support obligations, and he has not previously assigned any portion of his
structured settlement payment rights. (Id.
at ¶¶ 7, 10.) Prior to entering this transaction with
Petitioner, Payee requested that his beneficiary under the annuity be changed
to his personal estate. (Id. at ¶
12.) Accordingly, there are no
additional beneficiaries under the annuity that would be interested parties. (Id.)
Payee was
provided with a disclosure statement on July 8, 2022. (Pet. Exh. B.) Payee resides in the County of Los
Angeles. (Pet. ¶ 1.) Petitioner did not provide copies of the
underlying settlement, but states that it is continuing to use reasonable efforts
to obtain the same and will provide them to the extent is it able to obtain
it. (Pet. ¶ 9.)
Payee has
waived his right to seek independent counsel or financial advice regarding the
transfer. (Pet. Exh. C., Z.R. Decl., ¶
14.)
The Court
finds that while the Petition complies with most the statutory obligations
required by Insurance Code sections 10134 - 10139.5, it fails to include
a proof of service on the Payee and the Attorney General--the interested
parties. “The Transferee has complied
with the notification requirements pursuant to paragraph (2) of subdivision
(f), the transferee has provided the payee with a disclosure form that complies
with Section 10136, and the transfer agreement complies with Sections 10136 and
10138.” (Ins. Code, § 10139.5, subd. (a)(3).) “Not less than 20 days prior to
the scheduled hearing on any¿petition¿for approval of a transfer of structured
settlement payment rights under this article, the transferee shall file with
the court and serve on all interested parties a notice of the proposed transfer
and the¿petition¿for its authorization…” (Ins. Code, § 10139.5, subd. (f)(2).)
“‘Interested parties’ means, with respect to a structured settlement agreement,
the payee, the payee's attorney, any beneficiary irrevocably designated under
the annuity contract to receive payments following the payee's death, the
annuity issuer, the structured settlement obligor, and any other party who has
continuing rights or obligations under the structured settlement agreement.”
(Ins. Code, § 10134, subd. (g).)
The court
therefore continues the petition to provide Petitioner an opportunity to serve
the Petition and Notice of hearing of the Petition on Payee and the Attorney
General.
The
hearing is CONTINUED to December 2, 2022.