Judge: Deirdre Hill, Case: 21STCV04426, Date: 2022-08-25 Tentative Ruling
Case Number: 21STCV04426 Hearing Date: August 25, 2022 Dept: M
|
Superior Court
of California County of Los
Angeles Southwest
District Torrance Dept. M |
|||
|
GURMAIJ
SALL, |
Plaintiff, |
Case No.: |
21STCV04426 |
|
vs. |
|
[Tentative]
RULING |
|
|
HOMEWOOD
SUITES BY HILTON LOS ANGELES INTERNATIONAL AIRPORT, et al., |
Defendants. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Hearing Date: Thursday, August 25, 2022
Moving
Parties: Defendants, KOAR Airport Associates, Park Hotels & Resorts Inc.
f/k/a Hilton Worldwide, Inc.
and SVI Airport LLC
Responding Party: None.
Motion To Compel
Deposition of Plaintiff
The court considered the moving
papers. As of present, plaintiff has not
filed an opposition to defendants’ motion. Defendants
KOAR Airport Associates, Park Hotels & Resorts Inc. f/k/a Hilton Worldwide,
Inc. were dismissed on 8-22-22.
RULING
Defendant SVI Airport LLC’s motion
to compel deposition of plaintiff is GRANTED.
BACKGROUND
On February 4, 2021, plaintiff
Gurmaij Sall initiated the present action by filing a complaint against
defendants Homewood Suites by Hilton Los Angeles International Airport, KOAR
Airport Associates, LLC, Hilton Worldwide, Inc., Joyner Zecena, Eguardo Aguayo,
and Does 1 through 25. Plaintiffs’
complaint alleges the following causes of action: (1) negligence; and (2)
premises liability.
On April 28, 2021, defendants KOAR
Airport Associates and SVI Airport LLC filed an answer.
On April 30, 2021, defendant Park
Hotels & Resorts Inc. f/k/a Hilton Worldwide, Inc. filed an answer.
On January 11, 2022, plaintiff’s
action was transferred and reassigned to Department M of the Torrance
Courthouse.
On March 1, 2022, the court denied
plaintiff’s motion for trial preference, without prejudice.
A Trial Setting Conference is
scheduled to commence on August 25, 2022.
LEGAL AUTHORITY
“The
service of a deposition notice under Section 2025.240 is effective to
require any deponent who is a party to the action or an officer, director,
managing agent, or employee of a party to attend and to testify, as well as to
produce any document, electronically stored information, or tangible thing for
inspection and copying.” (CCP, §
2025.280, subd. (a).) If, after service
of a deposition notice, a party deponent fails to appear, testify, or produce
documents or tangible things for inspection without having served a valid
objection under Code of Civil Procedure section 2025.410, the deposing party
may move for an order compelling attendance, testimony, and production. (CCP, § 2025.450, subd. (a).) The motion must be accompanied by a meet and
confer declaration, or, when a party deponent fails to attend the deposition,
by a declaration stating that the moving party has contacted the party deponent
to inquire about the nonappearance. (CCP,
§ 2025.450, subd. (b)(2).) If the
deposition notice included a request for production of documents, the motion to
compel attendance must also show good cause to justify the production. (CCP, § 2025.450, subd. (b)(1).)
DISCUSSION
Defendants
KOAR Airport Associates, Park Hotels & Resorts Inc. f/k/a Hilton Worldwide,
Inc., and SVI Airport LLC moved for an order compelling plaintiff’s attendance
at a deposition within fifteen (15) days of this court’s order, on the ground
plaintiff failed to appear for a noticed deposition on approximately June 13,
2022.
Following
a review of defendants’ arguments and submitted evidence, the court finds
defendants are entitled to an order compelling plaintiff’s attendance during deposition
within fifteen (15) days of this court’s order, pursuant to CCP § 2025.450,
subdivision (a). (CCP, § 2025.450, subd.
(a).) Defendants have demonstrated that,
despite defendants’ service of a deposition notice upon plaintiff, and despite
plaintiff’s failure to serve objections to the same, plaintiff has failed to
appear for deposition on the date noticed by defendants. Defendants demonstrate that, on June 21,
2021, defendants served a deposition notice upon plaintiff, effectively
notifying plaintiff that her deposition would take place virtually on August 3,
2021. (Cruz Decl., ¶ 2, Ex. A.) Following plaintiff’s request, defendant agreed
to continue plaintiff’s deposition and, accordingly, served a second notice of
deposition on approximately May 20, 2022, which notified plaintiff that her
deposition would now occur on June 13, 2022.
(Id., ¶¶ 2,-4, Ex.
B.) Defendants additionally demonstrate
that, in response to the aforementioned second notice of deposition, plaintiff
did not serve any objections thereto and, further, failed to appear for
deposition on June 13, 2022, for which a certificate of non-appearance was
taken. (Id. ¶¶ 4-7, Ex. C.) Thereafter, defendants inquired with
plaintiff’s counsel regarding the non-appearance, however “[p]laintiff’s
counsel has not responded to any attempts to communicate or meet and
confer”. (Id., ¶¶ 7-9.) Based on the foregoing, the court finds
defendants are entitled to an order compelling plaintiff’s attendance during
deposition, pursuant to CCP § 2025.450, subdivision (a). (CCP, § 2025.450, subd. (a).)
Defendants KOAR Airport Associates,
Park Hotels & Resorts Inc. f/k/a Hilton Worldwide, Inc. were dismissed on
8-22-22. Sole remaining moving Defendant SVI Airport LLC’s motion to compel deposition of plaintiff is
GRANTED.
SVI Airport LLC’s is ordered to give notice of ruling.