Judge: Deirdre Hill, Case: 21STCV20535, Date: 2023-01-17 Tentative Ruling
ALERT
Due to Coronavirus, please consider appearing by phone for Department M cases.
Department M strongly encourages the use of LA CourtConnect* for ALL hearings, without need for prior approval, unless live testimony by a witness is required.
The contact information for LA CourtConnect* is:
https://lacourt.portalscloud.com/VCourt/
*Parties with a fee waiver on file may be eligible to appear at no/reduced cost
Dept. M issues tentative rulings in many, but not all motion hearings. There is no set time at which tentatives are posted. Please do not call the staff to inquire if a tentative will be posted.
If parties are satisfied with the ruling, parties may submit on the tentative. However, if an opposing party does not submit, they will be permitted to argue. Please check with the other side before calling the courtroom to submit. The staff does not keep track of which parties submitted and which did not, so please do not ask.
If a matter is also a scheduling hearing (CMC, TSC, OSC etc) an appearance is still required even if a party submits on the tentative ruling.
Case Number: 21STCV20535 Hearing Date: January 17, 2023 Dept: M
|
Superior
Court of Southwest
District Torrance
Dept. M |
|||
|
BRENDA
SESSION, et al., |
Plaintiffs, |
Case No.: |
21STCV20535 |
|
vs. |
|
[Tentative]
RULING |
|
|
MEMORIAL
HOSPITAL OF GARDENA, et al., |
Defendants. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Hearing
Date: January 17,
2023
Moving Party: Defendant Los Angeles
County Metropolitan Transportation Authority
Responding
Party: None
Judgment
on the Pleadings
The court considered the moving papers.
RULING
The motion is GRANTED WITHOUT LEAVE
TO AMEND as to plaintiffs Brenda Session and Lowdean Session as to the FAC.
BACKGROUND
On June 1, 2021, plaintiffs Brenda
Session, Lowdean Session, and Micah Session filed a complaint against Memorial
Hospital of Gardena and Los Angeles County Metropolitan Transportation
Authority for (1) wrongful death, (2) governmental negligence, and (3) medical
malpractice.
On May 31, 2022, the court (PI Hub)
denied defendant Gardena Hospital, L.P. dba Memorial Hospital of Gardena’s
motion to transfer PI case to IC court.
On June 23, 2022, the court (PI Hub)
sustained Gardena Hospital’s demurrer with leave to amend and denied the motion
to strike.
On July 18, 2022, plaintiffs filed a
FAC for (1) negligence and (2) medical malpractice.
On July 25, 2022, defendant Gardena
Hospital filed a stipulation to strike mention of punitive damages and
attorney’s fees from FAC and an order was entered on July 26, 2022.
On September 13, 2022, the court
sustained Gardena Hospital’s demurrer without leave to amend as to plaintiffs
Brenda and Lowdean Session on the ground that as parents, they lack standing
and the 2nd cause of action for medical malpractice as alleged by
them.
On October 10, 2022, Gardena
Hospital filed a notice of stay of proceedings as to a voluntary bankruptcy
petition filed by Pipeline Health System, LLC and 32 affiliated companies.
On October 25, 2022, the case was
transferred to Dept. M.
LEGAL AUTHORITY
CCP § 438 states, in relevant
part: “(b)(1) A party may move for
judgment on the pleadings. . . . (c)(1) The motion provided for in this section
may only be made on one of the following grounds: (A) If the moving party is a plaintiff, that
the complaint states facts sufficient to constitute a cause or causes of action
against the defendant and the answer does not state facts sufficient to
constitute a defense to the complaint.
(B) If the moving party is a defendant, that either of the following
conditions exist: . . . . (ii) The complaint does not state facts sufficient to
constitute a cause of action against that defendant.”
A motion for judgment on the
pleadings “has the purpose and effect of a general demurrer.” Smiley
v. Citibank (s.D.), N.A. (1995) 11 Cal. 4th 138, 146 (citation
omitted). “[T]he trial court generally
confines itself to the complaint and accepts as true all material facts alleged
therein. As appropriate, however, it may
extend its consideration to matters that are subject to judicial notice. In this, it performs essentially the same
task that it would undertake in ruling on a general demurrer.” Id.
(citations omitted).
DISCUSSION
Defendant
LA County Metropolitan Transportation Authority requests a judgment on the
pleadings as to the entire FAC, including the 1st cause of action
for negligence (identified as “Count 1”), which is the sole cause of action
against moving defendant, on the ground that the allegations are insufficient
to constitute a cause of action because plaintiffs Brenda and Lowdean Session
lack standing as decedent’s mother and father.
The
FAC alleges that plaintiffs Brenda Session and Lowdean Session are the mother
and father of deceased Marlon Lamont Session, and Micah Session is the son of
deceased. FAC, ¶8. On May 10, 2020, Marlon Lamont Session, then
age 46, was leaning against an MTA bus, operated by Metro and driven by Doe 21,
a driver trained and authorized by Metro, at 11922 S. Vermont at 2100 hours.
When the bus abruptly pulled forward, Marlon was struck by the bus and shoved
to the ground. Id., ¶17. There was no reason that a trained Metro
driver should have failed to identify that an adult male, 6’ in height and 282
pounds, was leaving against the MTA bus before abruptly pulling the bus
forward. Id., ¶18. Doe 21, the Metro driver, had a duty to
observe the surroundings of the bus before departing from a parked position,
knowing that pedestrians and passersby may be approaching, conversating by and
leaning against the bus. Doe 21 breached
that duty by abruptly pulling forward without warning, in a manner that Marlon
was struck by the MTA bus and sustained multiple fractures and other
injuries. Id., ¶19.
The
FAC further alleges that a bystander called 911 and an ambulance transported
Marlon to Gardena Hospital. Id., ¶23. While Marlon was admitted, his presentation
included rib fractures, bruising to his torso, a broken toe, abrasions to his
abdomen, abrasions to his right leg, shortness of breath, and neurologic
deficits. Id., ¶26. Despite that Marlon fit multiple risk factors
for post-traumatic blood clots, Does 1-20 did not order further study to
identify whether Marlon was developing blood clots, which, in fact, he
was. Id., ¶27. On May 11, 2020, Gardena Hospital ordered
that he should be discharged. Id., ¶28. Marlon went home. Gardena Hospital gave him no instructions
regarding the risk of development of post-traumatic blood clots. They gave him no instructions regarding
follow-up care if he showed signs of progression of post-traumatic blood clots. Marlon was unaware that he had blood clots in
his body, which thereafter progressed and grew over the next two weeks. Id., ¶29.
By May 22, 2020, Marlon was again reporting shortness of breath. Id., ¶30.
On May 26, 2020, Brenda Session found Marlon unresponsive on the floor
of Marlon’s home. She called 911 and
paramedics responded and transported Marlon to a different hospital. Id., ¶31.
But in spite of efforts to resuscitate Marlon, he was pronounced dead on
May 26, 2020. The Deputy Medical
Examiner performed an autopsy on Marlon and determined that the cause of
Marlon’s death was massive pulmonary thromboembolism due to deep vein
thrombosis, which in turn resulted from chronic immobility as a consequence of
traumatic leg injury resulting from the bus accident. Id., ¶32.
Defendant
contends that plaintiff Marlon Lamont Session, the son of decedent, is the only
person with standing under CCP §377.60.
CCP
§377.60 states: “A cause of action for
the death of a person caused by the wrongful act or neglect of another may be
asserted by any of the following persons or by the decedent’s personal
representative on their behalf: (a) The
decedent’s surviving spouse, domestic partner, children, and issue of deceased
children, or, if there is no surviving issue of the decedent, the persons,
including the surviving spouse or domestic partner, who would be entitled to
the property of the decedent by intestate succession. If the parents of the decedent would be
entitled to bring an action under this subdivision, and the parents are
deceased, then the legal guardians of the decedent, if any, may bring an action
under this subdivision as if they were the decedent’s parents.”
The
1st cause of action for negligence against moving defendant is based
on wrongful death. See para. 34
(“Plaintiffs allege that Defendant Metro and Defendant Doe 21 committed
negligence, which was the proximate cause of the wrongful death of Marlon
Session.”) There are no allegations that
plaintiff parents were dependent on decedent.
Plaintiffs did not file an opposition or indicate that they can amend
the FAC to address the issue of standing.
See
also the court’s September 13, 2022 minute order sustaining Gardena Hospital’s
demurrer without leave to amend on the same grounds.
The
motion is GRANTED WITHOUT LEAVE TO AMEND as to plaintiffs Brenda Session and
Lowdean Session.
Moving
party is ordered to give notice of ruling.