Judge: Deirdre Hill, Case: YC045070, Date: 2022-08-03 Tentative Ruling
Case Number: YC045070 Hearing Date: August 3, 2022 Dept: M
Superior
Court of Southwest
District Torrance
Dept. M |
|||
WELLS
FARGO BANK, N.A., |
Plaintiff, |
Case No.: |
YC045070 |
vs. |
|
[Tentative]
RULING |
|
THE
CLAW CORPORATION, et al., |
Defendants. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Hearing Date: August 3, 2022
Moving
Parties: Plaintiff and judgment debtor Wells Fargo Bank, N.A.
Responding
Party: None
Motion
for Order Correcting Application and Renewal of Judgment by Nunc Pro Tunc
The court considered the moving papers.
RULING
The motion is GRANTED. The Amended Application for and Renewal of
Judgment is deemed filed as of May 25, 2022.
BACKGROUND
On November 1, 2002, Wells Fargo
Bank, N.A. filed a complaint against The Claw Corporation, Leonard Elwin
Anderson, and Cary Wood Westcott.
A default judgment was entered on
April 1, 2003.
The judgment was renewed on August
27, 2012.
On April 20, 2022, plaintiff filed
an application for and renewal of judgment.
LEGAL AUTHORITY
Under CCP §187, “[w]hen
jurisdiction is, by the Constitution or this Code, or by any other statute,
conferred on a Court or judicial officer, all the means necessary to carry it
into effect are also given; and in the exercise of this jurisdiction, if the
course of proceeding be not specifically pointed out by this Code or the
statute, any suitable process or mode of proceeding may be adopted which may
appear most conformable to the spirit of this Code.”
Under CCP §473(d), “The court may,
upon motion of the injured party, or its own motion, correct clerical mistakes
in its judgment or orders as entered, so as to conform to the judgment or order
directed, and may, on motion of either party after notice to the other party,
set aside any void judgment or order. . . .”
DISCUSSION
Plaintiff
and judgment creditor Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. requests an order to amend the Application
for and Renewal of Judgment “nunc pro tunc.”
Plaintiff/judgment
creditor filed an Application for and Renewal of Judgment on April 20,
2022. On May 25, 2022, plaintiff filed
the herein motion for an order allowing it to file an Amended Application for
and Renewal of Judgment to include at para. 3.c. the information as to the
recordation of the original judgment (dates, Orange, San Diego, Ventura, Los
Angeles, and Riverside counties, and instrument nos.). The application filed on April 20, 2022
inadvertently did not include this information.
See Jennifer Hobbs decl.
The
motion is GRANTED to allow filing of the amended application.
Moving
party is ordered to give notice of ruling.