Judge: Douglas W. Stern, Case: 21STCV37489, Date: 2023-03-21 Tentative Ruling



Case Number: 21STCV37489    Hearing Date: March 21, 2023    Dept: 68

Itai Ziv vs. Youval Ziv, et al., Case No. 21STCV37489

Motion to Compel Responses to Form and Special Interrogatories and

Motion to Compel Responses to Requests for Production of Documents

Moving Party – Plaintiff Itai Ziv

            Plaintiff filed this action against Defendants Youval Ziv and Pacific Holdings Partnership dba Pacific Holdings, Group on October 8, 2021. On May 25, 2022, Plaintiff served initial Form Interrogatories and Special Interrogatories and Requests for Production on Defendants Youval Ziv and Pacific Holdings Partnership. Responses were due on June 28, 2022. (Motions at p. 3.) None were served. On July 20, 2022, Plaintiff’s counsel reached out to Defendants’ counsel to see if responses would be forthcoming. Defendants’ counsel responded that they had not responded because Defendants and Plaintiff were engaged in settlement discussions. (Motions at p. 4.) A settlement was not reached. On December 23, 2022, Plaintiff’s counsel reached out again to ask if Defendants would be responding. No response was received. As of the filings of the motions on January 9, 2023, Defendants had yet to provide Plaintiff with any responses to the discovery requests. (Motions at p. 4.)  No oppositions have been filed.

            The Court shall address the two motions separately below.

Analysis

I.                    Form Interrogatories and Special Interrogatories

The propounding party may move for an order compelling responses and monetary sanctions if a party to whom the interrogatories are directed fails to respond. (CCP §§ 2030.290, 2030.300; Sinaiko Healthcare Consulting, Inc. v. Pacific Healthcare Consultants (2007) 148 Cal.App.4th 390, 404.) Responses to interrogatories are due within thirty days from the date of service of the interrogatories. (CCP §§ 2030.260(a), 2016.050.) The responding party waives any objections to the interrogatories by failing to serve responses in a timely manner. (CCP § 2030.290(a).)

Defendants have failed to respond to Plaintiff’s Form and Special Interrogatories. Plaintiff has moved for an order compelling Defendants’ response to these Interrogatories. The Court GRANTS Plaintiff’s motion to compel responses. Defendants are ordered to provide responses without objections within twenty days of notice of this Order.

Sanctions

Plaintiff requests sanctions against Defendants and their counsel of record pursuant to CCP §§ 2030.290(c), 2023.010, and 2023.030. Section 2030.290(c) states as follows:

“The court shall impose a monetary sanction under Chapter 7 (commencing with Section 2023.010) against any party, person, or attorney who unsuccessfully makes or opposes a motion to compel a response to interrogatories, unless it finds that the one subject to the sanction acted with substantial justification for that other circumstances make the imposition of the sanction unjust.”

Section 2023.010(d) defines failing to respond or submit to an authorized method of discovery as a misuse of the discovery process. Monetary sanctions may be imposed against a party and its counsel for the misuse of discovery process pursuant to Section 2023.010(a). Sanctions may include the reasonable expenses, including attorney’s fees, incurred by anyone as a result of the misuse of discovery.

Defendants have failed to respond to Plaintiff’s Form and Special Interrogatories. Thus, sanctions are appropriate. Plaintiff has requested sanctions against Defendants and their counsel of record in the amount of $2,695. This amount was based on 2 hours for preparing the motion to compel and supporting documents at $490 an hour, and an anticipated additional 3 hours for reviewing the opposition, drafting a reply, and attending the hearing. (Korenaga Decl. ¶ 12.) However, no opposition was filed, which did not necessitate a reply, so 1/2 hour is more appropriate for the hearing. Therefore, 2.5 hours at $490 shall be awarded, fees of $1,225, plus the $60 filing fee for a total of $1,285 on this motion.

Sanctions are awarded in favor of Plaintiff in the amount of $1,285. Defendants Youval Ziv and Pacific Holdings Partnership and their counsel of record are ordered to pay sanctions (jointly and severally) in the amount of $1,285 on this motion to Plaintiff within 20 days of the date of the hearing on this motion.

II.                  Requests for Production

A propounding party may move to compel responses to requests for production of documents where the responding party fails to provide responses. (CCP § 2031.300.) The responding party must provide responses within thirty days after the demand is served. (CCP § 2031.030(c)(2) & (3).) The responding party waives all objections, including privilege and work product, by failing to timely respond to requests for production of documents. (CCP § 2031.300.)

Defendants have failed to provide responses to Plaintiff’s request for production of documents. Plaintiff has moved for an order compelling production of those documents. The Court GRANTS Plaintiff’s motion to compel responses. Defendants are ordered to provide responses without objections within twenty days of the hearing on this motion.

Sanctions

Plaintiff has also requested sanctions against Defendants Youval Ziv and Pacific Holdings Partnership and their counsel of record pursuant to CCP §§ 2031.300(c), 2023.010, and 2023.030. Section 2031.300(c) requires that monetary sanctions be imposed against any party, person, or attorney who unsuccessfully makes or opposes a motion to compel a response to a demand for production, unless the Court finds that the one subject to the sanction acted with substantial justification or that other circumstances make the imposition of the sanction unjust.

Section 2023.010(d) defines failing to respond or submit to an authorized method of discovery as a misuse of the discovery process. Monetary sanctions may be imposed against a party and its counsel for the misuse of discovery process pursuant to Section 2023.010(a). Sanctions may include the reasonable expenses, including attorney’s fees, incurred by anyone as a result of the misuse of discovery.

Defendants have failed to respond to Plaintiff’s requests for production of documents. Thus, sanctions are appropriate. Plaintiff has requested sanctions against Defendants and their counsel of record in the amount of $2,695. This amount was based on 2 hours for preparing the motion to compel and supporting documents at $490 an hour, and an anticipated additional 3 hours for reviewing the opposition, drafting a reply, and attending the hearing. (Korenaga Decl. ¶ 10.) However, no opposition was filed, which did not necessitate a reply, so 1/2 hour is more appropriate for the hearing. Therefore, 2.5 hours at $490 shall be awarded, fees of $1,225, plus the $60 filing fee for a total of $1,285 on this motion.

Sanctions are awarded in favor of Plaintiff in the amount of $1,285. Defendants Youval Ziv and Pacific Holdings Partnership and their counsel of record are ordered to pay sanctions (jointly and severally) in the amount of $1,285 on this motion to Plaintiff within 20 days of the date of the hearing on this motion.

ORDER:

1.      Defendants Youval Ziv and Pacific Holdings Partnership are ordered to serve complete answers, without objection, to the (1) Form Interrogatories, (2) Special Interrogatories and the (3) Requests for Production within 20 days of the date of service of this Order.

2.      Defendants Youval Ziv and Pacific Holdings Partnership as well as their counsel of record (jointly and severally) are ordered to pay sanctions in the total amount of $2,570 to counsel for Plaintiff within 45 days of service of this Order.