Judge: Elaine Lu, Case: 21STCV35518, Date: 2025-05-07 Tentative Ruling
Case Number: 21STCV35518 Hearing Date: May 7, 2025 Dept: 9
On May 6, 2025, Plaintiff filed the instant ex parte
application seeking to continue Plaintiff’s motion for class certification
filing deadline. Neither Plaintiff nor
Defendant appeared when the case was called at 8:30 am.
Plaintiff’s Ex Parte Application to continue the Class
Certification Deadline is CONTINUED.
Plaintiff has failed to submit a
written declaration demonstrating that timely notice of this ex parte
application was given to all parties, i.e. by 10:00 am the court day before the
ex parte appearance. CRC § 3.1203. Plaintiff’s
declaration in support of the ex parte application – the declaration of Joana
Fang – states that Plaintiff advised Defense counsel of this ex parte
application by email at an unspecified time.
There is no indication that Plaintiff notified Defendant by 10:00 am the
day before this hearing. Moreover, when
notice is given electronically – such as through email – the notice period is
extended by two court days. (CCP §
1010.6(a)(3)(B).) Thus, for Plaintiff to
give proper notice of this ex parte application solely by email, Plaintiff
would have had to notify Defendant by May 2, 2025 at 10:00 am. Plaintiff has failed to submit a written
declaration demonstrating that proper notice of this ex parte application was
given to all parties identifying the time and place for presentation of the
application. CRC § 3.1204(a)(1).
Accordingly, a continuance of the instant ex parte
application is necessary to ensure that Defendant receives proper, timely
notice.
On the merits, the Court has concerns – based on
Plaintiff’s moving papers — whether Plaintiff will be able to timely obtain
adequate discovery to file the motion for class certification. If a continuance is necessary, the record is
insufficient for the Court to determine how long the continuance needs to be to
sufficiently ensure that Plaintiff can obtain adequate discovery to file the
motion for class certification. Thus,
supplemental briefing is necessary.
By 4:30 pm on Monday, May 12, 2025, Plaintiff
must file a statement identifying the universe of all discovery that Plaintiff still
needs to obtain in order to file the motion for class certification – including
all written discovery and all depositions (identifying each witness by name). For each item of discovery or witness,
Plaintiff must set forth:
a. What
efforts have been made – to date – to obtain such discovery;
b. Why
Plaintiff needs such discovery before filing her motion for class certification,
i.e., why such discovery is reasonably calculated to lead to the discovery of
admissible evidence on the issue of class certification; and
c. If
the item requires litigation of a motion to compel or other discovery motion,
an explanation of why Plaintiff has not already filed such discovery motion and
an identification of the soonest date by which Plaintiff can file such
discovery motion
The Parties are ordered to meet and confer regarding
all items on Plaintiff’s list of necessary discovery for class certification
and file a Joint Statement by 10 am on May 16, 2025, with a conformed,
filed-stamped courtesy copy to Department 9 by 4:30 pm on May 16, 2025. In this Joint Statement, for each
item/witness on Plaintiff’s exhaustive list of discovery necessary before
Plaintiff can file her motion for class certification, the parties must set
forth:
A. Any
agreement[s] reached with respect to the item of discovery – e.g., (i) any
agreement on the proper scope of substantive responses, (ii) a date for
the deposition of the witness, (iii) a date for Defendant to serve written
responses and produce documents, (iv) a deadline by which Plaintiff will file
any motion to compel responses to this item of discovery;
B. If
the parties are at an impasse for any item of discovery, 2-3 sentences as to
their respective positions and why they cannot agree.
Plaintiff’s ex parte application to continue
Plaintiff’s motion for class certification filing deadline is CONTINUED TO
May 22, 2025 at 10:00 am.
Based on Plaintiff’s additional briefing and the
parties’ joint statement, the Court will determine whether a continuance is
warranted and if so, the reasonable length of such a continuance. The parties should be aware that the Court
will approximate that each discovery motion that Plaintiff files can be
calendared for hearing approximately 3-4 months from the filing of said
discovery motion.
The Court Clerk shall give electronic notice of this
order to all parties. Plaintiff’s
Counsel is also ordered to give notice to all other parties and file proof of
service of such.