Judge: Elaine Lu, Case: 22STCV20470, Date: 2022-08-05 Tentative Ruling

Case Number: 22STCV20470    Hearing Date: August 5, 2022    Dept: 26

 

Superior Court of California

County of Los Angeles

Department 26

 

 

KENNETH HORWAT (aka KENNY HORWAT),

                        Plaintiff,

            v.

                

ERIC DOAK (aka ERIK DOAK); DOOMSDAYX, CO., et al., 

                        Defendants.

 

  Case No.:  22STCV20470

 

  Hearing Date:  August 5, 2022

 

[TENTATIVE] ORDER RE:

APPLICATION FOR AN ORDER PERMITTING EVAN SPENCER AS COUNSEL PRO HAC VICE

 

 

Evan Spencer (“Spencer”) applies as counsel pro hac vice for Plaintiff Kenneth Horwat.  The application is unopposed.

Under CRC Rule 9.40, attorneys licensed and in good standing in other states may, upon the California court’s approval, appear as counsel pro hac vice in a pending case if an active member of the state bar is associated as attorney of record.  (CRC 9.40(a).)  Spencer is an active member, in good standing, of the State of New York, the U.S. District Court of the Southern District of New York, the U.S. District Court of Nebraska, and the U.S. Court of Claims.  (Spencer Decl. ¶¶ 2-4.)  In addition, Spencer states that he is not a resident of California or regularly engaged in business in California and is a resident of Nebraska with an office in New York.  (Spencer Decl. ¶¶ 7-11.)  Spencer states that he has not applied to appear pro hac vice in any California action.  (Spencer Decl. ¶ 12.)  Thus, counsel satisfy the eligibility requirements of CRC 9.40(a).

Spencer’s application successfully addresses all six content requirements outlined in CRC 9.40(d).  Specifically, Spencer provides in his application: (1) his residence and office address (Spencer Decl. ¶¶ 10-11); (2) the courts to which Spencer has been admitted to practice and the dates of admission (Spencer Decl. ¶ 2); (3) that Spencer is a member in good standing in those courts (Spencer Decl. ¶ 3); (4) that he is not currently suspended or disbarred in any court (Spencer Decl. ¶ 4); (5) the title of each court and cause in which the applicant has filed an application to appear as counsel pro hac vice in this state in the preceding two years, and whether or not it was granted if any (Spencer Decl. ¶ 12); and (6) the name, address, and telephone number of an active member, Walter Tyrrel Shatford IV of the State Bar of California who are the current counsel of record for Plaintiff Kenneth Horwat (Spencer Decl. ¶ 13; Shatford Decl. ¶¶ 2-3).

Furthermore, Spencer demonstrates that he has meet the requirement of CRC 9.40(c)(1). That rule provides: “a person desiring to appear as counsel pro hac vice in a superior court must file with the court a verified application together with proof of service . . . of a copy of the application and of the notice on all parties who have appeared in the cause and on the State Bar of California at its San Francisco office.”  (See Attached Proof of Service.)

 

CONCLUSION AND ORDER

The application of Evan Spencer to appear as counsel pro hac vice for Plaintiff Kenneth Horwat is GRANTED.

The Moving Party is ordered to provide notice of this order and file a proof of service of such.

 

DATED: August 5, 2022                                                        ___________________________

                                                                                          Elaine Lu

                                                                                          Judge of the Superior Court