Judge: Elaine Lu, Case: 22STCV35339, Date: 2023-03-15 Tentative Ruling
Case Number: 22STCV35339 Hearing Date: March 15, 2023 Dept: 26
On
January 10, 2023, Justin S. Levy filed an application to appear as counsel pro
hac vice for Defendant XL Specialty Insurance Company.
On
January 10, 2023, Leslie S. Ahari filed an application to appear as counsel pro
hac vice for Defendant XL Specialty Insurance Company.
On
January 11, 2023, Scott N. Godes filed an application to appear as counsel pro
hac vice for Plaintiffs DigitalBridge Group, Inc. (f/k/a Colony Capital, Inc.)
and DigitalBridge Operating Company, LLC (f/k/a Colony Capital Operating
Company, LLC).
On
January 27, 2023, Daniel G. Enriquez filed an application to appear as counsel
pro hac vice for Defendant Twin City Fire Insurance Co.
On
February 16, 2023, Matthew Mawby filed an application to appear as counsel pro
hac vice for Defendant Great American Insurance Co.
On
February 17, 2023, Jordan W. Ziolkowski filed an application to appear as
counsel pro hac vice for Defendant Freedom Specialty Insurance Company.
On
February 23, 2023, Darius N. Kandawalla filed an application to appear as
counsel pro hac vice for Defendant Freedom Specialty Insurance Company.
On
March 1, 2023, Matthew W. Beato filed an application to appear as counsel pro
hac vice for Defendant U.S. Specialty Insurance Company.
On
March 3, 2023, in the interest of judicial economy, the Court reset Counsel
Scott N. Godes, Justin S. Levy, Leslie S. Ahari, Daniel G. Enriquez, Matthew
Mawby, Darius N. Kandawalla, Matthew W. Beato, and Jordan W. Ziolowski’s
applications to be admitted pro hac vice to be heard together on March 15,
2023.
The
applications by Counsel successfully address all six content requirements
outlined in California Rules of Court, Rule 9.40(d). Specifically, each
Counsel provides in their application: (1) their residence and office address;
(2) the courts to which Counsel has been admitted to practice and the dates of
admission; (3) that Counsel is a member in good standing in those respective
courts; (4) that Counsel is not currently suspended or disbarred in any court;
(5) the title of each court and cause in which the applicants have filed an
application to appear as counsel pro hac vice in this state in the
preceding two years, and whether or not it was granted if any; and (6) the
name, address, and telephone number of an active members of the State Bar of
California who is the current counsel of record for the respective party that
Counsels are seeking to represent pro hac vice in the instant action.
Further,
each Counsel demonstrates that they have met the requirement of California
Rules of Court, Rule 9.40(c)(1). That rule provides: “a person desiring
to appear as counsel pro hac vice in a superior court must file with the
court a verified application together with proof of service . . . of a copy of
the application and of the notice on all parties who have appeared in the cause
and on the State Bar of California at its San Francisco office.”
The
application of Justin S. Levy to appear as counsel pro hac vice for Defendant
XL Specialty Insurance Company is GRANTED
The
application of Leslie S. Ahari to appear as counsel pro hac vice for Defendant
XL Specialty Insurance Company is GRANTED.
The
application of Scott N. Godes to appear as counsel pro hac vice for Plaintiffs
DigitalBridge Group, Inc. (f/k/a Colony Capital, Inc.) and DigitalBridge
Operating Company, LLC (f/k/a Colony Capital Operating Company, LLC) is
GRANTED.
The
application of Daniel G. Enriquez to appear as counsel pro hac vice for
Defendant Twin City Fire Insurance Co. is GRANTED.
The
application of Matthew Mawby to appear as counsel pro hac vice for Defendant
Great American Insurance Co. is GRANTED.
The
application of Jordan W. Ziolkowski to appear as counsel pro hac vice for
Defendant Freedom Specialty Insurance Company is GRANTED.
The
application of Darius N. Kandawalla to appear as counsel pro hac vice for
Defendant Freedom Specialty Insurance Company is GRANTED.
The
application of Matthew W. Beato to appear as counsel pro hac vice for Defendant
U.S. Specialty Insurance Company is GRANTED.
Each
moving party is to download this order, give notice to all other parties, and
file proof of service of such.