Judge: Elaine Lu, Case: 24STCV10365, Date: 2025-06-17 Tentative Ruling
Case Number: 24STCV10365 Hearing Date: June 17, 2025 Dept: 9
Preliminary Approval of Class Action Settlement
Department SSC-9
Hon. Elaine Lu
Eliseo Navarrete v. Relativity
Space, Inc.
Case No.: 24STCV10365
Hearing: June 17, 2025
TENTATIVE RULING
Plaintiff’s Motion for Preliminary Approval of Class
Action Settlement is CONDITIONALLY GRANTED CONTINGENT ON Counsel
adequately addressing the following items:
1. At Settlement Agreement ¶5.2, please remove the reference
to the “PAGA Notice.” Released class claims should be limited to the facts and
claims alleged in the operative complaint. Also, in the heading of the
paragraph, remove the language “Who Are Not Aggrieved Employees” as the release
is applicable to all Participating Class Members regardless of their status as
Aggrieved Employees.
2. At Settlement Agreement ¶5.3, the PAGA release should
apply to all Aggrieved Employees under the settlement. The reference to
“Non-Participating Class Members Who Are…” should be removed from the heading
and also from the body of the paragraph. The release is applicable to all Aggrieved
Employees regardless of their status as Class Members.
3. At Settlement Agreement ¶7.5.4, the reference to
“Paragraph 5.4” appears to be in error and should refer to “Paragraph 5.3”
instead. Please revise.
4. At Settlement Agreement ¶¶1.39-1.40, the references to
“Paragraph 6.2” appear to be in error and should refer to ¶5.2 and ¶5.3,
respectively. Please revise.
5. Once the Settlement Agreement is revised, ensure that the
class and PAGA releases disclosed to Class Members in the Class Notice are
verbatim to the releases in the Settlement Agreement.
Please modify the Class Notice to match any alterations
to the Settlement Agreement.
If the Settlement Agreement is modified pursuant to this
checklist, please submit both a red-lined copy showing changes made as well as
a clean final version signed by all parties. Please do not submit an addendum
in lieu of a full amended settlement agreement including all operative
settlement terms. The Court requests
that any revised Settlement and any revised Notice be submitted in two formats:
(1) a clean version signed by all parties, and (2) a redlined version
highlighting changes made from the current Settlement and Notice. Both formats should be fully text-searchable.
If Counsel file and serve text searchable supplemental
documents correcting the above defects by 12 pm on June 16, 2025, then
the Court will grant Plaintiff’s motion at the hearing set for June 17, 2025.
Otherwise, the Court may have to continue the motion.
The Judicial Assistant is to give notice to Counsel for
Plaintiff who is ordered to give further and formal notice to all parties.