Judge Elaine Lu, Case Number: 24STCV24265, Date: 2025-01-24 Tentative Ruling

Judge: Elaine Lu, Case: 24STCV24265, Date: 2025-01-24 Tentative Ruling

Case Number: 24STCV24265 Hearing Date: January 24, 2025 Dept: 9

Please note that the January 24, 2025 Initial Status Conference has been advanced to begin at 8:30 am on January 24, 2025 – not 10 am. The Court hereby distributes a tentative ruling for the CMO. The parties are welcome to provide input and propose modification(s) to any aspect of the CMO at the January 24, 2025 Initial Status Conference. If all parties submit on the tentative CMO prior to the commencement of the ISC, the Court will adopt the tentative CMO, and the parties need not appear.

SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA

FOR THE COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES

Melissa Ryan v Authentic Brands Group, Inc.

24STCV24265

[TENTATIVE] CASE MANAGEMENT ORDER

This action has been designated as complex pursuant to CRC 3.400(a), and thus requires exceptional judicial management. All provisions of this CMO are deemed necessary to carry out the purposes of Rule 3.400(a), and to promote effective decision-making by the Court. They are based upon individual consideration of this complex action, including the Status Conference Reports previously filed by the parties.

1. Plaintiff is unaware of any relevant arbitration agreements and/or class action waiver. Defendant is gathering facts to assess whether a relevant arbitration agreement and/or class action waiver exists.

2. All Parties indicate that they are amenable to early mediation with a private mediator. The parties are ordered to file a Joint Status Report Re: Mediation Efforts, including the identity of any mediator they have selected and the date of any mediation they have scheduled, no later than April 21, 2025. A Non-Appearance Case Review Re Mediation Efforts is set for April 28, 2025 at 8:30 AM, Department 9. If the parties agree to a voluntary, informal exchange of discovery prior to mediating, the Court encourages (but does not require or order) the parties to include a verification with each production of discovery so that if the mediation is unsuccessful, the parties will not have to duplicate or repeat this exchange of discovery.

3. The Court hereby lifts the stay to permit Defendant to file and serve a Responsive Pleading to the Complaint. Defendant must file and serve a Responsive Pleading by no later than February 24, 2025. Before filing any demurrer or other motion, the moving party must contact the Court Staff in Department 9 to obtain a hearing date and a briefing schedule. The Court sets a Non-Appearance Case Review Re: Filing and Serving of Defendant’s Responsive Pleading for March 3, 2025, 8:30 AM, Department 9.

4. Phased Discovery. Discovery will be phased with the stay lifted once Defendant files and serves an answer or, if applicable, after the Court rules on any pleading challenge. At that time, the Court will permit class certification discovery only. Informal discovery is permitted. Merits-based discovery will be allowed after a successful class certification motion. If there is a dispute concerning whether a given discovery request is certification or merits-based, the parties are to set up a telephonic conference with the court pursuant to the instructions herein.

5. Class list discovery. The decision in In Re Insurance Installment Fee cases (2012) 211 Cal.App.4th 1395, 1426-1429, held that the notice procedure prescribed by the trial court and followed by the defendant was necessary to protect privacy rights under the California Constitution. The parties therefore shall use the procedure described in Belaire-West Landscape v Superior Court (2008) 149 Cal.App.4th 554 to notify putative class members, as described in the applicable paragraph of the currently operative complaint, giving them the opportunity to opt out. The parties must share the cost of the procedure equally.

a. Plaintiff is to take the lead and prepare a proposed letter to be sent out by the agreed-upon third party administrator. The parties must discuss and settle upon a final version.

b. The letter must be written using the administrator’s letterhead, not that of any party.

c. The defense must turn over the contact information consisting of name, address, phone number, and email address (if available) to the third-party administrator.

d. In the event the putative class list is greater than 400 people, the administrator must randomly select a sample of no more than 400. The contact information for those persons who did not opt out must be turned over to the plaintiff.

6. Protective Order. Parties are alerted that model protective orders may be found at Los Angeles Superior Court website at http://www.lacourt.org/division/civil/CI0043.aspx. The parties are encouraged to use these model orders as shown, or if modified, as a template for the modified order. A redlined courtesy copy must be posted on the e-service bulletin board and lodged with the court at the time of filing. The parties must use the redlined version to identify any changes proposed to the model order.

7. E-service & E-filing. Electronic service is not the same as electronic filing. The parties have agreed, and the Court has signed an order authorizing Case Anywhere as the e-service to be used in this case. Argument must not be posted on the bulletin board. For information on electronic filing in the Complex Courts, please refer to https://www.lacourt.org/division/efiling/efiling2.aspx and http://www.lacourt.org/division/efiling/pdf/ComplexefilingFAQs.pdf.

8. Class Certification Motion. Class Certification Motion filing and serving deadline is January 26, 2026. The plaintiff is reminded that the plaintiff’s brief must contain a trial plan. The trial plan MUST be filed as a separate brief. As with all other motions, Counsel must call the Court to obtain a hearing date and briefing schedule PRIOR to filing and serving the motion for Class Certification. The Court sets a Non-Appearance Case Review for February 2, 2026, 8:30 AM, Department 9.

9. Telephonic conferences. The Court handles discovery motions informally, using telephonic conferences and LA CourtConnect. Counsel must post a message via their Electronic Service Provider to request any informal discovery conference or other conference. The Court will either reply to the message or issue a Minute Order setting the conference. The telephonic conference will automatically be taken off calendar if all relevant parties have not scheduled the telephonic conference with LA CourtConnect. Parties must file and serve a 5-page joint brief two days before the conference. Since these conferences are informal, no court reporter or audio recording is permitted.

10. Potential Related Cases. Counsel are ordered to file and serve a Notice of Related Case for any potentially related cases pursuant California Rule of court Rule 3.300, including any PAGA case involving the same representative plaintiff. This is a continuing obligation on both plaintiffs and defendants while this case is pending.

11. Settlement. File any Notice of Settlement on Judicial Council form CM-200, a mandatory form. If settlement includes dismissal of class action claims, then Plaintiff must comply with CRC 3.769 and 3.770 in order to obtain dismissal of class claims. Do NOT use Judicial Council Form Civ-110, Request for Dismissal.

Plaintiff is ordered to download the instant signed order from the Court’s website, to give formal notice to all other parties, and to file proof of service of such within five (5) days.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

DATED: January 24, 2025

__________________________

ELAINE LU

Judge of the Superior Court