Judge: Gary I. Micon, Case: 24CHCV02205, Date: 2025-01-23 Tentative Ruling
Case Number: 24CHCV02205 Hearing Date: January 23, 2025 Dept: F43
Dept. F43
Date: 01-23-25
Case # 24CHCV02205, Clark v. FCA US LLC,
et al.
Trial Date: None set.
MOTION TO COMPEL
FURTHER RESPONSES TO PLAINTIFF’S REQUESTS FOR PRODUCTION (SET ONE)
MOVING PARTY: Plaintiff Brandon Clark
RESPONDING PARTY: Defendant FCA US LLC
RELIEF REQUESTED
Order compelling Defendant’s responses to Requests
for Production (Set One) numbers 3, 22, 28, 29, 35, and 61.
RULING: The parties are ordered to review the Court’s
Song-Beverly Litigation Discovery Order and to conduct a meaningful meet and
confer in person, by telephone, or by video conference.
SUMMARY OF ACTION
Plaintiff Brandon Clark (Plaintiff) purchased
a 2021 Jeep Wrangler 4XE from defendant Tuttle Click Inc., a Chrysler
dealership, on December 11, 2021. The
vehicle began experiencing mechanical defects, and Plaintiff sued defendants
FCA US LLC (FCA), and Tuttle Click Inc. for violating the Song-Beverly Consumer
Warranty Act, alleging that defendants were unable to repair the defects and
did not replace the car or make restitution.
The complaint alleges causes of action for breach of express warranty,
breach of implied warranty, violations of California’s Unfair Competition Law, and
negligent repair.
On September 4, 2024, Plaintiff propounded
his Requests for Production (Set One) on FCA.
FCA served responses on October 3, 2024.
Plaintiff was not satisfied with several of FCA’s responses, and FCA
failed to provide further responses.
Plaintiff filed this motion to compel further
responses to its Requests for Production (Set One) numbers 3, 22, 28, 29, 35,
and 61 on December 2, 2024. FCA filed an
opposition on January 13, 2025.[1] No reply has been filed.
MEET AND CONFER
Before filing a motion to compel further
responses or responsive documents to requests for production, the parties must
meet and confer to resolve the issues with the discovery responses. The moving party must file a “meet and confer”
declaration stating facts showing a reasonable and good faith attempt at an
informal resolution of each issue in the motion. (Code Civ. Proc., §§ 2031.310, subd. (b)(2),
2016.040.) In Department 43, “meet and
confer” means in person or via phone, not by letter or email. (Department F43 Courtroom Information, at p.
2.)
Plaintiff’s counsel, Maxwell Kreymer, emailed
a meet and confer letter to defense counsel on October 15, 2024, which outlined
the issues with FCA’s responses and set a new deadline to submit responses to
October 28, 2024. (Declaration of Maxwell
Kreymer, ¶ 5, Exh. C.) FCA did not
provide any reasonable response to Plaintiff’s “meet and confer” letter. (Kreymer Dec., ¶ 7.)
The Court has reviewed the documents related
to this motion and will not decide the motion on the merits at this time
because the moving papers do not indicate the parties met and conferred.
The Court orders the parties to review the
Court’s Song-Beverly Litigation Discovery Order and to meet and confer with the
Order in mind. The parties must meet and
confer directly, not by email, to resolve as much as they can. Further, the parties are ordered to file a
joint statement of remaining issues by a date to be set by the Court. The joint statement should briefly describe
the matters in dispute, followed by Plaintiff’s arguments, then FCA’s
arguments.
ORDER
1. The parties are ordered to review the
Court’s Song-Beverly Litigation Discovery Order and to conduct a meaningful
meet and confer with the Order in mind.
The parties must meet and confer in person, by telephone, or by video
conference.
2. The parties shall submit a joint statement
of the remaining issues as described above. The format should be as follows: The parties
should recite the specific discovery request(s) at issue, followed by the
moving party’s statement of why it should be compelled, followed by the
opposing party’s statement of why it should not be compelled. To the extent that an argument is repeated for
a subsequent request, the party shall simply refer to the section where the
argument was previously made.
3. The deadline for the status report will be
set at the hearing on this motion.
Plaintiff to give notice.
[1]
All opposition papers must be filed and served at least nine (9) days before
the motion hearing. (Code Civ. Proc., §
1005, subd. (b).) FCA’s opposition was
due January 9, 2025.