Judge: Gregory Keosian, Case: 19STCV44611, Date: 2023-02-07 Tentative Ruling
Case Number: 19STCV44611 Hearing Date: February 7, 2023 Dept: 61
I.
MOTION FOR
ATTORNEY FEES
“Except as
attorney's fees are specifically provided for by statute, the measure and mode
of compensation of attorneys and counselors at law is left to the agreement,
express or implied, of the parties; but parties to actions or proceedings are
entitled to their costs, as hereinafter provided.” (Code Civ. Proc.,
§ 1021.)
“In any action on a
contract, where the contract specifically provides that attorney's fees and
costs, which are incurred to enforce that contract, shall be awarded either to
one of the parties or to the prevailing party, then the party who is determined
to be the party prevailing on the contract, whether he or she is the party
specified in the contract or not, shall be entitled to reasonable attorney's
fees in addition to other costs.” (Civ. Code, § 1717, subd. (a).) “[T]he party
prevailing on the contract shall be the party who recovered a greater relief in
the action on the contract.” (Civ. Code, § 1717, subd. (b)(1).)
This court on June
20, 2022, entered judgment in favor of Plaintiff M&O Holdings, LLC
(Plaintiff), including an award of $23,885.00 in attorney fees, based on a
previous motion for same. On November 7, 2022, this court denied Defendant
David Cunningham’s motion to set aside the judgment. Plaintiff thus seeks fees
incurred in that motion and bringing the present motion for fees, both under
the attorney fee provision for prevailing parties contained in the lease at
issue (Puritsky Decl. Exh. A), and under Code of Civil Procedure § 685.040,
which allows for attorney fees incurred in enforcing the judgment, if the
judgment enforced includes an attorney fee award. (Code Civ. Proc. § 685.040.)
The fees that
Plaintiff seeks amount to $19,332.50, representing 47.7 hours of work by two
attorneys at $395 and $475 per hour. (Puritsky Decl. Exh. D.) As attested to in
the billing records provided with the motion, this time is divided into 24.4
hours at $475 per hour spent contesting Defendant’s motion to vacate judgment,
and 23.3 hours preparing the present motion for fees. (Ibid.) Each
attorney provides a declaration attesting to their qualifications and
experience in litigation of this type in support of the rates charged.
(Puritsky Decl. ¶¶ 7–9; Moore Decl. ¶ 2.) The charges described in the
billing records are reasonable, as are the hourly rates. Defendant has filed no
opposition to this motion.
The motion for
attorney fees is therefore GRANTED in the amount of $19,332.50.