Judge: Gregory Keosian, Case: 21STCV42024, Date: 2022-12-07 Tentative Ruling
Case Number: 21STCV42024 Hearing Date: December 7, 2022 Dept: 61
Defendant
Los Angeles County Metropolitan Transit Authority’s Motions to Compel Responses
to Requests for Production and Form and Special Interrogatories from Plaintiff
Dana Pharr are GRANTED. Sanctions are awarded against Plaintiff in the amount
of $470.
Defendants to give notice.
I.
MOTIONS
TO COMPEL
A propounding party may demand a responding
party to produce documents that are in their possession, custody or control.
(Code Civ. Proc., § 2031.010.) A party may likewise conduct discovery by
propounding interrogatories to another party to be answered under oath. (Code
Civ. Proc. § 2030.010, subd. (a).) The responding party must respond to the
production demand either by complying, by representing that the party lacks the
ability to comply, or by objecting to the demand. (Code Civ. Proc., §
2031.210.) The responding party must respond to the interrogatories by
answering or objecting. (Code Civ. Proc. § 2030.210, subd. (a).) If the
responding party fails to serve timely responses, the propounding party may
move for an order compelling responses to the production demand and
interrogatories. (Code Civ. Proc., §§ 2030.290, 2031.300.)
A
party who fails to serve a timely response to interrogatories or a demand for
inspection waives any objection to the demand. (Code Civ. Proc., §§ 2030.290,
2031.300.)
Defendant
Los Angeles County Metropolitan Transit Authority (Defendant) moves to compel
responses to requests for production and form and special interrogatories, set one,
served upon Plaintiff Dana Pharr (Plaintiff) on September 13, 2022. (Guest
Decl. ¶ 3.) Despite offering an extension of the time to respond to October 28,
2022, Plaintiff has not provided responses to the discovery or responded to the
offer.(Guest Dec. ¶¶ 4–5, Exh. B.)
If
objection-free responses are not provided by the date of hearing on these
motions, the motions shall be GRANTED.
II. SANCTIONS
The
prevailing party on a motion to compel is generally entitled to monetary
sanctions, unless the court “finds that the one subject to the sanction acted
with substantial justification or that other circumstances make the imposition
of the sanction unjust.” (Code Civ. Proc. §§ 2030.290, 2031.300.) Sanctions are
also mandatory against a party whose failure to serve responses to requests for
admission makes the motion necessary. (Code Civ. Proc. § 2033.280, subd. (c).)
Defendant
seeks $235.00 in connection with each motion, representing one hour spent
preparing each, for a total of $470.00. (Guest Decl. ¶¶ 6–7.) Sanctions are
awarded against Plaintiff in the amount of $470.