Judge: H. Jay Ford, III, Case: 19SMCV01498, Date: 2025-05-06 Tentative Ruling
Case Number: 19SMCV01498 Hearing Date: May 6, 2025 Dept: O
Case Name:
Moda v. Diba, et al.
|
Case No.: 19SMVC01498 |
Complaint Filed:
8-26-19 |
|
Hearing Date:
5-6-25 |
Discovery C/O: 8-6-22 |
|
Calendar No.: 9 |
Discovery Motion C/O: 8-22-22 |
|
POS: OK |
Trial Date: 8-26-24 |
SUBJECT: MOTION TO TAX COSTS
MOVING
PARTY: Plaintiff Kevin Moda
RESP.
PARTY: Defendants Kasey Diba,
Matthew Sichi, Finnegan & Diba, a law Corp
TENTATIVE
RULING
Plaintiff
Kevin Moda’s Motion to Tax Costs is DENIED.
Defendants Kasey Diba, Matthew
Sichi, Finnegan & Diba, a law Corp are the prevailing party on Kevin Moda’s
Complaint against the Diba Defendants under CCP § 1032(a)(4). Moda voluntarily electronically filed his Request
for Dismissal of his complaint against the Diba Defendants on October 21, 2024,
on the morning of the day of trial, less than one hour before the Court called
the case for trial and for hearing on the Diba Defendant’s Motion to Dismiss
Moda’s complaint, and the Court’s Order to Show Cause why Moda’s complaint against
the Diba Defendants should not be dismissed for failure to prosecute. The Diba
Defendants filed their Request for Dismissal of their cross-complaint against
Moda on October 25, 2024. Neither
dismissal was the result of a settlement or agreement to a mutual dismissal of the
parties claims against each other.
Defendants’ memorandum of costs seeks
costs that are allowable by statute. Plaintiff
does not meet his burden to show the costs are unreasonable or unnecessary.
Defendant’s may submit a judgement
for an award of costs of $85,239.09.