Judge: H. Jay Ford, III, Case: 19SMCV02073, Date: 2022-07-28 Tentative Ruling
Case Number: 19SMCV02073 Hearing Date: July 28, 2022 Dept: O
Case Name:
Kopek, et al. v. Mardirossian, et al.
|
Case No.: 19SMCV02073 |
Complaint Filed: 12-2-19 |
|
Hearing Date: 7-28-22 |
Discovery C/O: 1-4-22 |
|
Calendar No.: 11 |
Discover Motion C/O: 12-18-21 |
|
POS: OK |
Trial Date: 10-3-22 |
SUBJECT: MOTION TO COMPEL ATTENDANCE OF
DEFENDANT BAGRAM MARDIROSSIAN AT DEPOSITION PURSUANT TO COURT ORDER DATED
2-1-22
MOVING
PARTY: Plaintiffs George C. Kopek
and Toni Kopek
RESP.
PARTY: Defendant Bagram
Mardirossian
TENTATIVE
RULING
Plaintiffs
George Kopek and Toni Kopek’s Motion to Compel Attendance of Defendant Bagram
Mardirossian at Deposition pursuant to Court Order dated 2-1-22 is DENIED. Defendant’s request for sanctions is
DENIED.
The
Court’s order dated 2-1-22 stated as follows:
“Defendant Bagram Mardirossian will appear for another session of
his deposition not to exceed seven hours, including at least one hour
dedicated to examination on behalf of the HOA.”
The Court ordered one additional session of Mardirossian’s deposition,
not to exceed seven hours. The Court did
not order Mardirossian to sit for another seven hours of deposition. All parties agree that Mardirossian has sat
for two additional sessions of deposition since the Court’s 2-1-22 order. Mardirossian has fully complied with the
Court’s 2-1-22 order. Plaintiffs’
request that Mardirossian sit for a fifth deposition session is DENIED.