Judge: H. Jay Ford, III, Case: 22SMCV00924, Date: 2022-10-06 Tentative Ruling
Case Number: 22SMCV00924 Hearing Date: October 6, 2022 Dept: O
Case
Name: Nulane Entertainment, LLC v.
Notre Dame Properties Ltd. Liability Company, et al.
|
Case No.: 22SMCV00924 |
Complaint Filed: 6-17-22 |
|
Hearing Date: 9-20-22 |
Discovery C/O: None |
|
Calendar No.: 9 |
Discover Motion C/O: None |
|
POS: OK |
Trial Date: None |
SUBJECT: MOTION TO
CONSOLIDATE
MOVING
PARTY: Plaintiff Nulane
Entertainment, LLC
RESP.
PARTY: Plaintiff MDRCA
Properties LLC
TENTATIVE
RULING
Plaintiff
Nulane Entertainment LLC’s Motion to Consolidate is GRANTED with the condition
that Nulane deposit with the Court, or an agreed upon escrow or trust account all
monthly rent MDRCA claims is due each month under the lease pending further
order of the Court. Nulane is to prepare
the proposed order.
As
acknowledged in Martin-Bragg v. Moore (2013) 219 Cal.App.4th
367, consolidation of a UD action and a civil action involving complex title
issues would improperly compromise the due process rights of those involved in
the complex title dispute by forcing litigation within the summary procedures
of a UD action. See Martin-Bragg,
supra, 219 Cal.App.4th at 391-393. The Court must weigh the rights and needs of
the party asserting the complex title dispute against the UD plaintiff’s right
to a prompt resolution of the UD matter and arrive at a solution that would
best preserve both parties’ rights. Id.
at 393 (“With or without consolidation of the cases, trial courts have
available options to address plaintiffs' legitimate rights and need for
protection from unjustified delay of the unlawful detainer proceeding, while
still affording reasonable opportunities for discovery and to prepare for trial
of complex issues relating to the property's title. The trial court has
discretion, for example, to sever and separately try the issue of title to the
property, while assuring the availability of fair compensation to the plaintiff
for any delay in acquiring possession. (Code Civ. Proc., § 1170.5, subd. (c)
[court may order defendant to pay contract rent into court during delay of
trial for defendant's benefit].”)
Plaintiff
Nulane is challenging MDRCA Proprties LLC’s right to possession in the UD
action. Nulane’s defense to the UD
action is based on Nulane’s right to specific performance of the Residential
Purchase Agreement. Nulane argues MDRCA
was not a bona fide purchaser and any right to specific performance would apply
to MDRCA. Complex issues of title and
MDRCA’s right to possession cannot be litigated in the UD without prejudicing
Plaintiff Nulane.
MDRCA
argues Martin Bragg is distinguishable, because the property had not yet
been sold to a bona fide purchaser.
MDRCA argues the property has been sold already. However, Nulane is challenging MDRCA’s status
as bona fide purchaser. If Nulane
successfully establishes that MDRCA is not a bona fide purchaser, Nulane can
obtain a decree of specific performance against MDRCA and Notre Dame. “When the seller conveys title to a third party
prior to the consummation of the transaction to the buyer, the buyer's right to
pursue the remedy of specific performance depends on the status of the third
party transferee. If the third party transferee is a bona fide purchaser,
having paid value for the property without notice of the prior sales contract,
the buyer cannot obtain a decree of specific performance, and the buyer's
remedy is limited to an action for damages against the seller. [¶]
However, if the third party transferee is not a bona fide purchaser, the
buyer can obtain a decree of specific performance against the third party
transferee.” Miller and Starr (4th
ed.) 12 California Real Estate §40:25
For
this reason, Martin Bragg is not inapposite, and its reasoning
applies. The actions are consolidated
because they involve overlapping issues of law and fact. Both actions address MDRCA’s right to
possession. Plaintiff Nulane’s Motion to
Consolidate is GRANTED. Plaintiff Nulane
is ordered to deposit all outstanding rent and rent due into escrow pending
resolution of this civil action for specific performance.