Judge: Holly J. Fujie, Case: 20STCV37565, Date: 2023-04-18 Tentative Ruling
DEPARTMENT 56 JUDGE HOLLY J. FUJIE, LAW AND MOTION RULINGS. The court makes every effort to post tentative rulings by 5.00 pm of the court day before the hearing. The tentative ruling will not become the final ruling until the hearing [see CRC 3.1308(a)(2)], and are also available in the courtroom on the day of the hearing [see CRC 3.1308(b)]. If the parties wish to submit on the tentative ruling and avoid a court appearance, all counsel must agree and choose which counsel will give notice. That counsel must 1) call Dept 56 by 8:30 a.m. on the day of the hearing (213/633-0656) and state that all parties will submit on the tentative ruling, and 2) serve notice of the ruling on all parties. If any party declines to submit on the tentative ruling, then no telephone call is necessary and all parties should appear at the hearing in person or by Court Call. Court reporters are not provided, and parties who want a record of motions and other proceedings must hire a privately retained certified court reporter.
Case Number: 20STCV37565 Hearing Date: April 18, 2023 Dept: 56
SUPERIOR
COURT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA
FOR
THE COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES - CENTRAL DISTRICT
|
Plaintiff, vs. COMET RADIOLOGY LLC, et al.,
Defendants. |
|
[TENTATIVE] ORDER RE: MOTION TO BE
RELIEVED AS COUNSEL Date:
April 18, 2023 Time: 8:30 a.m. Dept. 56 |
MOVING PARTY: Rick M. Martin (“Martin”)
Martin
seeks to be relieved as counsel for Defendant Comet Radiology LLC
(“Comet”). Martin’s motion to be
relieved as counsel (the “Motion”) is compliant with California Rules of Court, rule 3.1362. The Motion is unopposed. Any opposition papers were required to have
been filed and served at least nine court days before the hearing under
California Code of Civil Procedure section 1005, subdivision (b).
DISCUSSION
The
court has discretion on whether to allow an attorney to withdraw, and a motion
to withdraw will not be granted where withdrawal would prejudice the
client. (Ramirez v. Sturdevant (1994) 21 Cal.App.4th 904, 915.)
In
support of the Motion, Martin declares that there has been a breakdown in the
attorney-client relationship that makes it impossible to continue the
representation. The Court notes that
counsel informed the Court on the day set for trial that the matter had been
settled and the Court took the trial off-calendar for that reason. The Court therefore orders that counsel
explain the status of the case at the time of the hearing on this Motion and
the Court will decide at that time whether it will allowed to withdraw as
counsel in this case.
Moving
party is ordered to give notice of this ruling.
In consideration
of the current COVID-19 pandemic situation, the Court¿strongly¿encourages
that appearances on all proceedings, including this one, be made
by LACourtConnect if the parties do not submit on the tentative.¿¿If
you instead intend to make an appearance in person at Court on this matter, you
must send an email by 2 p.m. on the last Court day before the scheduled date of
the hearing to¿SMC_DEPT56@lacourt.org¿stating your intention to appear in person.¿
The Court will then inform you by close of business that day of the time your
hearing will be held. The time set for the hearing may be at any time during
that scheduled hearing day, or it may be necessary to schedule the hearing for
another date if the Court is unable to accommodate all personal appearances set
on that date.¿ This rule is necessary to ensure that adequate precautions can
be taken for proper social distancing.
Parties who intend to submit on this
tentative must send an email to the Court at SMC_DEPT56@lacourt.org as directed
by the instructions provided on the court website at www.lacourt.org. If
the department does not receive an email and there are no appearances at the
hearing, the motion will be placed off calendar.
Dated this 18th day of April 2023
|
|
|
|
|
Hon.
Holly J. Fujie Judge
of the Superior Court |