Judge: Holly J. Fujie, Case: 20STCV46212, Date: 2022-11-30 Tentative Ruling
DEPARTMENT 56 JUDGE HOLLY J. FUJIE, LAW AND MOTION RULINGS. The court makes every effort to post tentative rulings by 5.00 pm of the court day before the hearing. The tentative ruling will not become the final ruling until the hearing [see CRC 3.1308(a)(2)], and are also available in the courtroom on the day of the hearing [see CRC 3.1308(b)]. If the parties wish to submit on the tentative ruling and avoid a court appearance, all counsel must agree and choose which counsel will give notice. That counsel must 1) call Dept 56 by 8:30 a.m. on the day of the hearing (213/633-0656) and state that all parties will submit on the tentative ruling, and 2) serve notice of the ruling on all parties. If any party declines to submit on the tentative ruling, then no telephone call is necessary and all parties should appear at the hearing in person or by Court Call. Court reporters are not provided, and parties who want a record of motions and other proceedings must hire a privately retained certified court reporter.
Case Number: 20STCV46212 Hearing Date: November 30, 2022 Dept: 56
SUPERIOR
COURT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA
FOR
THE COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES - CENTRAL DISTRICT
Plaintiff, vs. FRANK D. LANTERMAN REGIONAL CENTER, et al.,
Defendants. |
|
[TENTATIVE] ORDER RE: MOTION TO BE
RELIEVED AS COUNSEL Date:
November 30, 2022 Time: 8:30 a.m. Dept. 56 Jury Trial: March 13, 2023 |
MOVING PARTY: Dennis L. Kennelly (“Kennelly”)
Kennelly seeks to
be relieved as counsel for Plaintiff.
Kennelly’s motion to be relieved as counsel (the “Motion”) is compliant
with California Rules of Court,
rule 3.1362. The Motion is
unopposed. Any opposition papers were
required to have been filed and served at least nine court days before the
hearing under California Code of Civil Procedure section 1005,
subdivision (b).
DISCUSSION
The
court has discretion on whether to allow an attorney to withdraw, and a motion
to withdraw will not be granted where withdrawal would prejudice the
client. (Ramirez v. Sturdevant (1994) 21 Cal.App.4th 904, 915.)
Novconnection
with the Motion, Kennelly declares that he has recently experienced a serious
medical issue that resulted in his hospitalization and medical advice that
continuing with his law practice would be harmful to his health. The Court finds this to be an adequate basis
for withdrawal. The Court therefore
GRANTS the Motion. (Sexton v. Superior Court (1997)
58 Cal.App.4th 1403, 1410.)
Moving
party is ordered to give notice of this ruling.
In consideration of the current COVID-19
pandemic situation, the Court¿strongly¿encourages that appearances on
all proceedings, including this one, be made by LACourtConnect if the
parties do not submit on the tentative.¿¿If you instead intend to make an
appearance in person at Court on this matter, you must send an email by 2 p.m.
on the last Court day before the scheduled date of the hearing to¿SMC_DEPT56@lacourt.org¿stating your intention to appear in person.¿ The Court will then
inform you by close of business that day of the time your hearing will be held.
The time set for the hearing may be at any time during that scheduled hearing
day, or it may be necessary to schedule the hearing for another date if the
Court is unable to accommodate all personal appearances set on that date.¿ This
rule is necessary to ensure that adequate precautions can be taken for proper
social distancing.
Parties
who intend to submit on this tentative must send an email to the Court at
SMC_DEPT56@lacourt.org as directed by the instructions provided on the court website
at www.lacourt.org. If the department does not receive an email and there
are no appearances at the hearing, the motion will be placed off
calendar.
Dated this 30th day of November 2022
|
|
|
Hon.
Holly J. Fujie Judge
of the Superior Court |