Judge: Holly J. Fujie, Case: 20STCV48954, Date: 2022-10-31 Tentative Ruling
Case Number: 20STCV48954 Hearing Date: October 31, 2022 Dept: 56
SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA
FOR THE COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES - CENTRAL
DISTRICT
MOVING PARTY: Plaintiff
RESPONDING PARTIES: Defendant Sentinel
Insurance Company, LTD (“Defendant”) and nonparties Julie S. Wood (“Wood”) and
Entertainment Insurance Services, Inc. (“EIS”)
The Court has
considered the moving and opposition papers. No reply papers were filed. Any reply papers were required to have been
filed and served at least five court days before the hearing under California Code
of Civil Procedure (“CCP”) section 1005, subdivision (b).
BACKGROUND
Plaintiff’s complaint
(the “Complaint”) alleges: (1) equitable subrogation (failure to defend); (2)
equitable subrogation (failure to accept a settlement within policy limits);
and (3) equitable subrogation (failure to provide notice of claim). On August 19, 2022, Plaintiff filed a motion
to compel (the “Motion”) further deposition of nonparties Wood and EIS.
EVIDENTIARY OBJECTIONS
Defendant’s objection to the Declaration of
Paul A. Impellezzeri (“Impellezzeri Decl.”) number 2 is SUSTAINED. Objections numbers 1, 3, and 4 are OVERRULED.
DISCUSSION
Under CCP
section 2025.480, where a deponent fails to answer any questions or produce any
document, electronically stored information, or tangible thing under the
deponent’s control that is specified in the deposition notice or deposition
subpoena, the party seeking discovery may move the court for an order
compelling that answer or production.
(CCP § 2025.480, subd. (a).) The motion must be made no later than 60 days
after the completion of the record of the deposition, and shall be accompanied
by a meet and confer declaration. (CCP §
2045.480, subd. (b).) With respect to
requests for documents, the 60-day period during which a motion to compel must be filed begins to
run when the deponent serves objections on the party. (Board of Registered Nursing v. Superior
Court (2021) 59 Cal.App.5th 1011, 1032.) With respect to oral testimony, not less than five days
prior to the hearing on the motion, the moving party shall lodge with the court
a certified copy of any parts of the stenographic transcript of the deposition
that are relevant to the motion. (CCP
§ 2025.480, subd. (h).)
Plaintiff served EIS with an
amended subpoena on March 22, 2022.
(Impellezzeri Decl. ¶ 2.), EIS served its objections to the subpoena on
April 20, 2022. (Impellezzeri Decl. ¶ 3,
Exhibit A.) Wood testified on behalf of
EIS during the April 26, 2022 deposition.
(Impellezzeri ¶ 4.) On June 27,
2022, Plaintiff filed a request for an informal discovery conference (“IDC”)
with the Court.
At the outset, the Court
notes that it is not entirely clear if Plaintiff is solely seeking further
document production, or if it is also seeking to have Wood provide further
testimony. Regardless, the Motion is not
timely. While Plaintiff has not lodged a
transcript of the relevant portions of Wood’s testimony with the Court, the
Opposition provides evidence that the deposition officer provided notice of the
transcript’s completion by electronic and mail service on May 4, 2022. (See Declaration of Ted A. Smith
(“Smith Decl.”) ¶ 10, Exhibit 7.)
IDCs are only available to resolve discovery disputes
between parties to an action. (See CCP
§ 2016.080.) If a court is in
session and does not grant, deny, or schedule the party’s request for an IDC
within 10 calendar days after the initial request, the request shall be deemed
denied. (CCP § 2016.080, subd. (b).) Because this discovery
dispute involves a nonparty, Plaintiff was not entitled to an IDC, and the
Court’s lack of response to its IDC request within 10 days of its filing
constituted a denial of the request and there was therefore no tolling of the
deadline for Plaintiff to file the Motion.
(See id.)
The Court therefore DENIES
the Motion.
Moving party is ordered to give notice of
this ruling.
In consideration of the
current COVID-19 pandemic situation, the Court¿strongly¿encourages that
appearances on all proceedings, including this one, be made
by LACourtConnect if the parties do not submit on the tentative.¿¿If
you instead intend to make an appearance in person at Court on this matter, you
must send an email by 2 p.m. on the last Court day before the scheduled date of
the hearing to¿SMC_DEPT56@lacourt.org¿stating your intention
to appear in person.¿ The Court will then inform you by close of business
that day of the time your hearing will be held. The time set for the hearing
may be at any time during that scheduled hearing day, or it may be necessary to
schedule the hearing for another date if the Court is unable to accommodate all
personal appearances set on that date.¿ This rule is necessary to ensure that
adequate precautions can be taken for proper social distancing.
Parties who intend to submit on this
tentative must send an email to the Court at SMC_DEPT56@lacourt.org as directed
by the instructions provided on the court website at www.lacourt.org. If
the department does not receive an email and there are no appearances at the
hearing, the motion will be placed off calendar.
Dated this 31st day
of October 2022
|
|
|
|
|
Hon. Holly J. Fujie Judge of the Superior Court |