Judge: Holly J. Fujie, Case: 21STCV00971, Date: 2022-12-29 Tentative Ruling
DEPARTMENT 56 JUDGE HOLLY J. FUJIE, LAW AND MOTION RULINGS. The court makes every effort to post tentative rulings by 5.00 pm of the court day before the hearing. The tentative ruling will not become the final ruling until the hearing [see CRC 3.1308(a)(2)], and are also available in the courtroom on the day of the hearing [see CRC 3.1308(b)]. If the parties wish to submit on the tentative ruling and avoid a court appearance, all counsel must agree and choose which counsel will give notice. That counsel must 1) call Dept 56 by 8:30 a.m. on the day of the hearing (213/633-0656) and state that all parties will submit on the tentative ruling, and 2) serve notice of the ruling on all parties. If any party declines to submit on the tentative ruling, then no telephone call is necessary and all parties should appear at the hearing in person or by Court Call. Court reporters are not provided, and parties who want a record of motions and other proceedings must hire a privately retained certified court reporter.
Case Number: 21STCV00971 Hearing Date: December 29, 2022 Dept: 56
SUPERIOR
COURT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA
FOR
THE COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES - CENTRAL DISTRICT
|
Plaintiff, vs. FORD MOTOR COMPANY, et al., Defendants. |
|
[TENTATIVE] ORDER RE: MOTION TO COMPEL DEPOSITION Date:
December 29, 2022 Time: 8:30 a.m. Dept. 56 Jury Trial: September 18, 2023 |
MOVING
PARTY: Defendants Ford Motor Company and McCoy and Mills Ford (collectively,
“Moving Defendants”)
RESPONDING
PARTY: Plaintiff
The Court has considered the moving, opposition and reply
papers.
BACKGROUND
This action arises out of the lease
of an allegedly defective vehicle. The
currently operative second amended complaint (the “SAC”) alleges various violations
of the Song-Beverly Act, fraud by omission, and negligent repair.
On November 7, 2022, Moving
Defendants filed a motion to compel Plaintiff’s deposition (the “Motion”) and
for monetary sanctions.
DISCUSSION
Under
California Code of Civil Procedure
(“CCP”) section 2025.450, where a deponent fails to attend a deposition
and produce documents, an opposing party can ask the court to order the
deponent’s attendance and testimony at a deposition, as well the production of
the documents specified in the deposition notice. The motion must include: (1) facts showing
good cause justifying the production of documents; and (2) where a deponent
fails to attend the deposition and produce the documents, a declaration must
accompany the motion indicating that the party seeking the order to compel
contacted the deponent to inquire about the deponent’s nonappearance. (CCP § 2025.450, subd. (b)(1)-(2).)
Plaintiff’s deposition was originally noticed to occur on
October 19, 2022. (Declaration of Teresa
C. Alcarón (“Alcarón Decl.”), Exhibit A.)
On October 14, 2022, Plaintiff served an objection on the basis that he
was unable to appear for a deposition on the noticed date. (Alcarón Decl. ¶ 4, Exhibit B.) Although Moving Defendants requested another
deposition date, Plaintiff did not provide alternative dates. (See Alcarón Decl. ¶¶ 5-7.) Plaintiff further objected to a second
deposition date noticed to occur on October 31, 2022, to which Plaintiff also
objected. (Alcarón Decl. § 6,
Exhibits D-E.) The Motion argues that
Plaintiff’s failure to communicate suitable dates for his deposition prejudiced
Moving Defendants’ ability to meet statutory deadlines for filing a motion for
summary judgment.
When
the Motion was filed, the deadline for Moving Defendants to file a motion for
summary judgment was December 23, 2022.
On December 14, 2022, however, by stipulation of Plaintiff and Moving
Defendants, the trial was continued until September 18, 2023. Plaintiff provides evidence that he has been
attempting to coordinate a suitable date in early January 2023 for his
deposition to occur. (See Declaration
of Daniel Law (“Law Decl.”) ¶ 5.)
Due to the ongoing efforts to coordinate Plaintiff’s
deposition, the Court DENIES the Motion without prejudice. Moving Defendants are not precluded from
filing another motion to compel should Plaintiff fail to appear for a deposition
in January 2023. In light of this ruling,
Moving Defendants’ request for monetary sanctions is also denied.
Moving
party is ordered to give notice of this ruling.
In consideration
of the current COVID-19 pandemic situation, the Court strongly encourages
that appearances on all proceedings, including this one, be made by LACourtConnect
if the parties do not submit on the tentative. If you instead
intend to make an appearance in person at Court on this matter, you must send
an email by 2 p.m. on the last Court day before the scheduled date of the
hearing to SMC_DEPT56@lacourt.org stating your intention to appear in
person. The Court will then inform you by close of business that day
of the time your hearing will be held. The time set for the hearing may be at
any time during that scheduled hearing day, or it may be necessary to schedule
the hearing for another date if the Court is unable to accommodate all personal
appearances set on that date. This rule is necessary to ensure that
adequate precautions can be taken for proper social distancing.
Parties
who intend to submit on this tentative must send an email to the Court at
SMC_DEPT56@lacourt.org as directed by the instructions provided on the court
website at www.lacourt.org. If the
department does not receive an email and there are no appearances at the
hearing, the motion will be placed off calendar.
Dated this 29th day of December 2022
|
|
|
|
|
Hon. Holly J.
Fujie Judge of the
Superior Court |