Judge: Holly J. Fujie, Case: 21STCV10921, Date: 2022-07-29 Tentative Ruling
Case Number: 21STCV10921 Hearing Date: July 29, 2022 Dept: 56
SUPERIOR
COURT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA
FOR
THE COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES - CENTRAL DISTRICT
|
Plaintiff, vs. PEGASUS TRUCKING, LLC, et al., Defendants. |
|
[TENTATIVE] ORDER RE: MOTION TO ENTER
STIPULATED JUDGMENT Date:
July 29, 2022 Time: 8:30 a.m. Dept. 56 |
MOVING
PARTY: Plaintiff
The
Court has considered the moving papers.
No opposition papers were filed.
Any opposition papers were required to have been filed and served at
least nine court days before the hearing under California Code of Civil
Procedure (“CCP”) section 1005, subdivision (b).
BACKGROUND
On February 4, 2022, Plaintiff and Defendant Pegasus
Trucking, LLC (“Defendant”) entered into a settlement agreement (the
“Settlement Agreement”) which was filed with the Court on February 16,
2022. Contemporaneously with entering
into the Settlement Agreement, Plaintiff and Defendant executed a stipulation
for entry of Judgment (the “Stipulation”).
(Declaration of Stephany Yablow (“Yablow Decl.” ¶ 5, Exhibit A.) The Stipulation details terms for Defendant’s
payment to Plaintiff and conditions under which Plaintiff is authorized to seek
the entry of judgment against Defendant.
(See id.) Because
Defendant has defaulted on its payments pursuant to the Stipulation, Plaintiff
filed a motion to enter judgment pursuant to the Stipulation in the amount of
$152,879.78.
DISCUSSION
If
parties to pending litigation stipulate, in a writing signed by the parties
outside the presence of the court or orally before the court, for settlement of
the case, or part thereof, the court, upon motion, may enter judgment pursuant
to the terms of the settlement. (CCP §
664.6.) If requested by the parties, the
court may retain jurisdiction over the parties to enforce settlement until
performance in full of the terms of the settlement. (Id.)
Plaintiff
provides evidence that Defendant has defaulted on its payments to
Plaintiff. (Yablow Decl. ¶ 8;
Declaration of Aaron Kin (“Kin Decl.”) ¶¶ 12-14.) Plaintiff has also provided evidence that it
is entitled to the attorney’s fees and costs associated with filing the
Motion. Plaintiff seeks attorney’s fees
in the amount of $2,100, which represents: (1) three hours preparing the Motion
and accompanying papers; and (2) an anticipated three hours in connection with
the Motion and court appearance at an hourly rate of $350 per hour. (Yablow Decl. ¶¶ 11-12.) Plaintiff has also incurred $78.60 in filing
fees. (Yablow Decl. ¶ 13.)
As
it is unopposed, the Court GRANTS the Motion.
(Sexton v. Superior Court (1997) 58 Cal.App.4th 1403, 1410.) Judgment is to be entered against Defendant
in the amount of $152,870.78. In
addition, the Court awards Plaintiff attorney’s fees in the reasonable amount
of $1,050, which represents three hours preparing the moving papers at a rate
of $350 per hour and costs in the amount of $78.60.
Moving
party is ordered to give notice of this ruling.
In consideration of the current COVID-19 pandemic
situation, the Court¿strongly¿encourages that appearances on all
proceedings, including this one, be made by LACourtConnect if the
parties do not submit on the tentative.¿¿If you instead intend to make an
appearance in person at Court on this matter, you must send an email by 2 p.m.
on the last Court day before the scheduled date of the hearing to¿SMC_DEPT56@lacourt.org¿stating your intention to appear in person.¿ The Court will then
inform you by close of business that day of the time your hearing will be held.
The time set for the hearing may be at any time during that scheduled hearing
day, or it may be necessary to schedule the hearing for another date if the
Court is unable to accommodate all personal appearances set on that date.¿ This
rule is necessary to ensure that adequate precautions can be taken for proper
social distancing.
Parties
who intend to submit on this tentative must send an email to the Court at
SMC_DEPT56@lacourt.org as directed by the instructions provided on the court
website at www.lacourt.org. If the
department does not receive an email and there are no appearances at the
hearing, the motion will be placed off calendar.
Dated this 29th day of July 2022
|
|
|
|
|
Hon. Holly J.
Fujie Judge of the
Superior Court |