Judge: Holly J. Fujie, Case: 21STCV14551, Date: 2023-12-06 Tentative Ruling
DEPARTMENT 56 JUDGE HOLLY J. FUJIE, LAW AND MOTION RULINGS. The court makes every effort to post tentative rulings by 5.00 pm of the court day before the hearing. The tentative ruling will not become the final ruling until the hearing [see CRC 3.1308(a)(2)], and are also available in the courtroom on the day of the hearing [see CRC 3.1308(b)]. If the parties wish to submit on the tentative ruling and avoid a court appearance, all counsel must agree and choose which counsel will give notice. That counsel must 1) call Dept 56 by 8:30 a.m. on the day of the hearing (213/633-0656) and state that all parties will submit on the tentative ruling, and 2) serve notice of the ruling on all parties. If any party declines to submit on the tentative ruling, then no telephone call is necessary and all parties should appear at the hearing in person or by Court Call. Court reporters are not provided, and parties who want a record of motions and other proceedings must hire a privately retained certified court reporter.
Case Number: 21STCV14551 Hearing Date: December 6, 2023 Dept: 56
SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA
FOR THE COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES - CENTRAL DISTRICT
|
Plaintiff, vs. ASH AUTO SERVICES, INC., et al., Defendants. |
|
[TENTATIVE] ORDER RE: MOTION TO BE
RELIEVED AS COUNSEL Date:
December 6, 2023 Time: 8:30 a.m. Dept. 56 Judge: Holly J. Fujie Jury Trial: March 25, 2024 |
MOVING PARTY: Ruben Guerra (“Guerra”)
On November 8,
2023, Guerra filed a motion to be relieved as Plaintiff’s counsel (the
“Motion”). The Motion is compliant with
California Rules of Court, rule
3.1362. The Motion is unopposed. Any opposition papers were required to have
been filed and served at least nine court days before the hearing under
California Code of Civil Procedure section 1005, subdivision (b).
DISCUSSION
The court has
discretion on whether to allow an attorney to withdraw, and a motion to
withdraw will not be granted where withdrawal would prejudice the client. (Ramirez
v. Sturdevant (1994) 21 Cal.App.4th 904, 915.)
In support of the
Motion, Guerra declares that there has been a breakdown of the attorney/client
relationship that prevents the representation from continuing. The Court finds this to be an adequate basis
for withdrawal. For this reason and
because it is unopposed, the Court GRANTS the Motion. (Sexton v. Superior Court
(1997) 58 Cal.App.4th 1403, 1410.)
Moving party is
ordered to give notice of this ruling.
Parties who intend to submit on this tentative must send an email to
the Court at SMC_DEPT56@lacourt.org as directed by the instructions provided on
the court website at www.lacourt.org. If the department does not receive
an email and there are no appearances at the hearing, the motion will be placed
off calendar.
Dated this 6th day of December 2023
|
|
|
|
|
Hon.
Holly J. Fujie Judge
of the Superior Court |