Judge: Holly J. Fujie, Case: 21STCV20810, Date: 2022-08-22 Tentative Ruling
DEPARTMENT 56 JUDGE HOLLY J. FUJIE, LAW AND MOTION RULINGS. The court makes every effort to post tentative rulings by 5.00 pm of the court day before the hearing. The tentative ruling will not become the final ruling until the hearing [see CRC 3.1308(a)(2)], and are also available in the courtroom on the day of the hearing [see CRC 3.1308(b)]. If the parties wish to submit on the tentative ruling and avoid a court appearance, all counsel must agree and choose which counsel will give notice. That counsel must 1) call Dept 56 by 8:30 a.m. on the day of the hearing (213/633-0656) and state that all parties will submit on the tentative ruling, and 2) serve notice of the ruling on all parties. If any party declines to submit on the tentative ruling, then no telephone call is necessary and all parties should appear at the hearing in person or by Court Call. Court reporters are not provided, and parties who want a record of motions and other proceedings must hire a privately retained certified court reporter.
Case Number: 21STCV20810 Hearing Date: August 22, 2022 Dept: 56
SUPERIOR
COURT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA
FOR
THE COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES - CENTRAL DISTRICT
|
Plaintiff, vs. URBAN ALCHEMY, et al.,
Defendants. |
|
[TENTATIVE] ORDER RE: MOTION TO COMPEL DEPOSITION Date: August 22, 2022 Time: 8:30 a.m. Dept. 56 |
MOVING
PARTY: Britanie A. Crippen (“Crippen”), counsel for Plaintiff
The
Court has considered the moving papers.
No opposition papers were filed. Any
opposition papers were required to have been filed and served at least nine
court days before the hearing under California Code of Civil Procedure (“CCP”)
section 1005, subdivision (b).
BACKGROUND
This action arises out of an employment relationship. On July 8, 2022, Crippen filed a motion to
compel the deposition of Plaintiff (the “Motion”).
DISCUSSION
If, after service of a deposition notice, a party to the
action or an officer, director, managing agent, or employee of a party, or a
person designated by an organization that is a party, without having served a
valid objection, fails to appear for examination, or to proceed with it, or to
produce for inspection any document, electronically stored information, or
tangible thing described in the deposition notice, the party giving the notice
may move for an order compelling the deponent’s attendance and testimony and
the production for inspection of any document, electronically stored
information, or tangible thing described in the deposition notice. (CCP § 2025.450, subd. (a).) The motion must include: (1) facts showing
good cause justifying the production of documents; and (2) where a deponent
fails to attend the deposition and produce the documents, a declaration must
accompany the motion indicating that the party seeking the order to compel
contacted the deponent to inquire about the deponent’s nonappearance. (CCP § 2025.450, subd. (b)(1)-(2).)
Crippen filed the
Motion to compel Plaintiff’s deposition on the grounds that she has been unable
to contact him. (See Declaration
of Britanie A. Crippen (“Crippen Decl.”) ¶¶ 10-11.)
CCP section 2025.450, subdivision (a) specifies that the
party who noticed a deposition may move for an order compelling the deponent to
appear. (See CCP § 2025.450,
subd. (a).) Here, Crippen seeks to
compel a deposition noticed by Defendant.
(See Crippen Decl. ¶ 9, Exhibit 5.) Crippen is therefore not authorized to seek
an order compelling Plaintiff’s deposition.
The Court DENIES the Motion.
Moving
party is ordered to give notice of this ruling.
In consideration
of the current COVID-19 pandemic situation, the Court strongly encourages
that appearances on all proceedings, including this one, be made by LACourtConnect
if the parties do not submit on the tentative. If you instead
intend to make an appearance in person at Court on this matter, you must send
an email by 2 p.m. on the last Court day before the scheduled date of the
hearing to SMC_DEPT56@lacourt.org stating your intention to appear in
person. The Court will then inform you by close of business that day
of the time your hearing will be held. The time set for the hearing may be at
any time during that scheduled hearing day, or it may be necessary to schedule
the hearing for another date if the Court is unable to accommodate all personal
appearances set on that date. This rule is necessary to ensure that
adequate precautions can be taken for proper social distancing.
Parties
who intend to submit on this tentative must send an email to the Court at
SMC_DEPT56@lacourt.org as directed by the instructions provided on the court
website at www.lacourt.org. If the
department does not receive an email and there are no appearances at the
hearing, the motion will be placed off calendar.
Dated this 22nd day of August 2022
|
|
|
|
|
Hon.
Holly J. Fujie Judge
of the Superior Court |