Judge: Holly J. Fujie, Case: 21STCV42690, Date: 2023-03-13 Tentative Ruling
Case Number: 21STCV42690 Hearing Date: March 13, 2023 Dept: 56
SUPERIOR COURT OF THE
STATE OF CALIFORNIA
FOR THE COUNTY OF LOS
ANGELES - CENTRAL DISTRICT
|
Plaintiff, vs. FAHIEM
GAFFOOR, etc., et al., Defendants. |
|
[TENTATIVE] ORDER RE: MOTION FOR RELIEF FROM JURY TRIAL
WAIVER Date: March 13,
2023 Time: 8:30 a.m. Dept. 56 |
MOVING PARTY: Plaintiff
The
Court has considered the moving papers.
No opposition papers were filed.
Any opposition papers were required to have been filed and served at
least nine court days before the hearing under California Code of Civil
Procedure (“CCP”) section 1005, subdivision (b).
BACKGROUND
On October 13, 2022, after a non-appearance case review,
the Court issued an order noting that jury fees had not been posted and
scheduling a non-jury trial on February 5, 2024.[1] On November 16, 2022, the Court granted
Plaintiff’s request for fee waiver. On
January 11, 2023, Plaintiff filed a motion for relief from jury trial waiver (the
“Motion”).
DISCUSSION
The right to a trial by jury as
declared by Section 16 of Article I of the California Constitution shall be
preserved to the parties inviolate. (CCP
§ 631, subd. (a).) In civil cases, a
jury may only be waived pursuant to CCP section 631, subdivision (f). (Id.)
Failure to pay jury fees is grounds to find the right to a jury trial
has been waived. (CCP § 631, subd
(f)(5).) The court may, in its
discretion upon just terms, allow a trial by jury although there may have been
a waiver of a trial by jury. (CCP § 631,
subd. (g). The trial court should grant
a motion for relief of a jury waiver unless, and except, where granting such a
motion would work serious hardship to the objecting party. (Mackovska v. Viewcrest Road Properties
LLC (2019) 40 Cal.App.5th 1, 10.)
When there is doubt about whether to grant relief from a jury trial
waiver, the court must resolve that doubt in favor of the party seeking a jury
trial. (Id.)
This
matter is still in the pleading stage and the trial is not scheduled until next
year. For these reasons and because it
is unopposed, the Court GRANTS the Motion.
(Sexton v. Superior Court (1997) 58 Cal.App.4th 1403, 1410.)
Moving party is ordered to give notice
of this ruling.
In consideration
of the current COVID-19 pandemic situation, the Court¿strongly¿encourages
that appearances on all proceedings, including this one, be made
by LACourtConnect if the parties do not submit on the tentative.¿¿If
you instead intend to make an appearance in person at Court on this matter, you
must send an email by 2 p.m. on the last Court day before the scheduled date of
the hearing to¿SMC_DEPT56@lacourt.org¿stating your
intention to appear in person.¿ The Court will then inform you by close of
business that day of the time your hearing will be held. The time set for the
hearing may be at any time during that scheduled hearing day, or it may be
necessary to schedule the hearing for another date if the Court is unable to
accommodate all personal appearances set on that date.¿ This rule is necessary
to ensure that adequate precautions can be taken for proper social distancing.
Parties who intend to
submit on this tentative must send an email to the Court at
SMC_DEPT56@lacourt.org as directed by the instructions provided on the court
website at www.lacourt.org. If the department does not receive an email
and there are no appearances at the hearing, the motion will be placed off
calendar.
Dated this
13th day of March 2023
|
|
|
|
|
Hon. Holly J. Fujie Judge of the Superior Court |
[1] The Court notes that its calendar states that the
trial scheduled to begin on February 5, 2024 is listed as a jury trial.