Judge: Holly J. Fujie, Case: 22STCP01600, Date: 2023-04-07 Tentative Ruling
DEPARTMENT 56 JUDGE HOLLY J. FUJIE, LAW AND MOTION RULINGS. The court makes every effort to post tentative rulings by 5.00 pm of the court day before the hearing. The tentative ruling will not become the final ruling until the hearing [see CRC 3.1308(a)(2)], and are also available in the courtroom on the day of the hearing [see CRC 3.1308(b)]. If the parties wish to submit on the tentative ruling and avoid a court appearance, all counsel must agree and choose which counsel will give notice. That counsel must 1) call Dept 56 by 8:30 a.m. on the day of the hearing (213/633-0656) and state that all parties will submit on the tentative ruling, and 2) serve notice of the ruling on all parties. If any party declines to submit on the tentative ruling, then no telephone call is necessary and all parties should appear at the hearing in person or by Court Call. Court reporters are not provided, and parties who want a record of motions and other proceedings must hire a privately retained certified court reporter.
Case Number: 22STCP01600 Hearing Date: April 7, 2023 Dept: 56
SUPERIOR
COURT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA
FOR
THE COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES - CENTRAL DISTRICT
Plaintiff, vs. DESMOND
LINDSEY, et al., Defendants. |
|
[TENTATIVE] ORDER RE: DEMURRER Date: April 7, 2023 Time: 8:30 a.m. Dept. 56 |
AND
RELATED CROSS-ACTION
MOVING
PARTY: Defendant/Cross-Complainant JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A. (“Moving
Defendant”)
The
Court has considered the moving papers. No
opposition papers were filed. Any
opposition papers were required to have been filed and served at least nine
court days before the hearing under California Code of Civil Procedure section
1005, subdivision (b).
BACKGROUND
This
action arises out of a business relationship.
Plaintiff’s complaint (the “Complaint”) alleges: (1) breach of
partnership agreement; (2) breach of fiduciary duty; (3) misrepresentation; (4)
breach of implied covenant of good faith and fair dealing; (5) declaratory
relief; (6) unjust enrichment; (7) negligence; (8) breach of fiduciary duty;
(9) constructive trust; and (10) accounting.
Moving Defendant filed a demurrer (the “Demurrer”) to the seventh
through tenth causes of action on the grounds that the Complaint fails to state
facts sufficient to constitute a cause of action.
As it is unopposed, the Court SUSTAINS
the Demurrer with 20 days leave to amend. (Sexton v. Superior Court (1997)
58 Cal.App.4th 1403, 1410.)
Moving
party is ordered to give notice of this ruling.
In consideration of the
current COVID-19 pandemic situation, the Court strongly encourages that
appearances on all proceedings, including this one, be made by LACourtConnect
if the parties do not submit on the tentative. If you instead intend to make
an appearance in person at Court on this matter, you must send an email by 2
p.m. on the last Court day before the scheduled date of the hearing to SMC_DEPT56@lacourt.org stating your
intention to appear in person. The Court will then inform you by close of
business that day of the time your hearing will be held. The time set for the
hearing may be at any time during that scheduled hearing day, or it may be
necessary to schedule the hearing for another date if the Court is unable to
accommodate all personal appearances set on that date. This rule is necessary
to ensure that adequate precautions can be taken for proper social distancing.
Parties
who intend to submit on this tentative must send an email to the Court at
SMC_DEPT56@lacourt.org as directed by the instructions provided on the court
website at www.lacourt.org. If the
department does not receive an email and there are no appearances at the
hearing, the motion will be placed off calendar.
Dated this 7th day of April 2023
|
|
|
Hon. Holly J.
Fujie Judge of the
Superior Court |