Judge: Holly J. Fujie, Case: 22STCP03293, Date: 2023-01-04 Tentative Ruling
Case Number: 22STCP03293 Hearing Date: January 4, 2023 Dept: 56
SUPERIOR
COURT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA
FOR
THE COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES - CENTRAL DISTRICT
Petitioners, v. FREMONT CABINET IMPORTS, INC., Respondent. |
|
[TENTATIVE] ORDER RE: PETITION FOR
RELEASE OF PROPERTY FROM MECHANIC’S LIEN Date: January 4, 2023 Time: 8:30 a.m. Dept. 56 |
MOVING
PARTY: Petitioners
The
Court has considered the moving papers.
No opposition papers were filed.
Any opposition papers were required to have been filed and served at
least nine court days before the hearing under California Code of Civil
Procedure section 1005, subdivision (b).
BACKGROUND
On September 27, 2022, Petitioners filed a verified petition
(the “Petition”) for an order releasing their real property (the “Property”)
from a mechanic’s lien recorded by Respondent.
DISCUSSION
Under Civil Code § 8460, subdivision (a), a
mechanic’s lien expires and is unenforceable unless an action to enforce the
lien is commenced within 90 days of its recording. (Civ. Code § 8460, subd. (a).) If the claimant has not timely commenced an
enforcement action, the property owner may petition the court to release the
lien. (Id.)
At least 10 days before filing a petition to
release the lien, the moving party must demand in writing that the claimant
execute and record a release of the lien and set forth the grounds for that
demand. (Civ. Code § 8482.) The
petition must be verified. (Civ. Code §
8484.) In addition, the petition to
release a mechanic’s lien must also allege all of the following:
(a)
The date of recordation of the claim of lien. A
certified copy of the claim of lien shall be attached to the petition.
(b)
The county in which the claim of lien is recorded.
(c)
The book and page or series number of the place in
the official records where the claim of lien is recorded.
(d)
The legal description of the property subject to
the claim of lien.
(e)
Whether an extension of credit has been granted
under Section 8460, if so to what date, and that the time for commencement of
an action to enforce the lien has expired.
(f)
That the owner has given the claimant notice under
Section 8482 demanding that the claimant execute and record a release of the
lien and that the claimant is unable or unwilling to do so or cannot with
reasonable diligence be found.
(g)
Whether an action to enforce the lien is pending.
(h) Whether the owner of the property or interest in the property has
filed for relief in bankruptcy or there is another restraint that prevents the
claimant from commencing an action to enforce the lien.
(Civ. Code § 8484, subds. (a)-(h).)
The petition and notice of hearing must be served
at least 15 days before the hearing and in the same manner as service of
summons (or by certified or registered mail, postage prepaid, return receipt
requested). (Civ. Code § 8486.)
The petitioner has the initial burden of proof to
show compliance with the service and hearing date requirements, and the
claimant has the burden of proof as to the validity of the lien. (Civ. Code § 8488, subd. (a).) If the
petitioner prevails, the court shall order the property released from the
lien. (Civ. Code § 8488, subd. (b).)
The prevailing party is entitled to recover reasonable attorney’s
fees. (Civ. Code § 8488, subd. (c).)
The Petition provides evidence of a mechanic’s lien
recorded against the Property by Respondent on May 5, 2022. (Exhibit A.)
Respondent did not thereafter file an action to enforce the lien. On September 13, 2022, Petitioners sent Respondent
a written demand to remove the lien.
(Exhibit B.) Petitioners filed a
notice of hearing on the same day that they filed the Petition.
On October 17, 2022, Petitioners filed a proof of
service providing that the Petition and notice had been served on Respondent by
substitute service. The October 17, 2022
proof of service does not include a declaration of due diligence.
Petitioners request attorney’s fees in the amount
of $1,591.65. This amount represents:
(1) 1.6 hours of work in connection with the Petition at an hourly rate of $425
per hour; (2) an anticipated two hours preparing for and attending the hearing;
and (3) filing fees in the amount of $61.65.
(Declaration of Christine A. Chou (“Chou Decl.”) ¶ 4.)
The Court finds adequately sets forth a basis for
relief. Petitioners, have not, however,
filed sufficient proof that Respondent received adequate notice under Civil
Code sections 8108 and 8486. In the
event that Petitioners provide evidence that Respondent received sufficient
notice of the Petition at the time of the hearing, the Court is inclined to grant
the Petition and order that the lien recorded against the Property by
Respondent on May 5, 2022 be released and that Respondent pay Petitioners’
attorney’s fees in the reasonable amount of $741.65, which represents 1.6 hours
of work at a rate of $425 per hour and $61.65 in filing fees.
Moving
party is ordered to give notice of this ruling.
In consideration of the current COVID-19
pandemic situation, the Court¿strongly¿encourages that appearances on
all proceedings, including this one, be made by LACourtConnect if the
parties do not submit on the tentative.¿¿If you instead intend to make an
appearance in person at Court on this matter, you must send an email by 2 p.m.
on the last Court day before the scheduled date of the hearing to¿SMC_DEPT56@lacourt.org¿stating your intention to appear in person.¿ The Court will then
inform you by close of business that day of the time your hearing will be held.
The time set for the hearing may be at any time during that scheduled hearing
day, or it may be necessary to schedule the hearing for another date if the
Court is unable to accommodate all personal appearances set on that date.¿ This
rule is necessary to ensure that adequate precautions can be taken for proper
social distancing.
Parties
who intend to submit on this tentative must send an email to the Court at
SMC_DEPT56@lacourt.org as directed by the instructions provided on the court
website at www.lacourt.org. If the department does not receive an email
and there are no appearances at the hearing, the motion will be placed off
calendar.
Dated this 4th day of January 2023
|
|
|
Hon.
Holly J. Fujie Judge
of the Superior Court |