Judge: Holly J. Fujie, Case: 22STCV09671, Date: 2023-02-17 Tentative Ruling
Case Number: 22STCV09671 Hearing Date: February 17, 2023 Dept: 56
SUPERIOR
COURT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA
FOR
THE COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES - CENTRAL DISTRICT
MOVING
PARTY: Plaintiff
The Court has considered the moving
papers. No opposition papers were
filed. Any opposition papers were
required to have been filed and served at least nine court days before the
hearing under California Code of Civil Procedure (“CCP”) section 1005,
subdivision (b).
BACKGROUND
Plaintiff filed a complaint (the
“Complaint”) on March 18, 2022 alleging: (1) breach of leases; (2) breach of
guaranties; (3) claim and delivery; and (4) conversion. Defendants collectively filed an answer (the
“Answer”) on May 23, 2022.
On
August 9, 2022, Defendant Goodland Global Farm Inc. (“Goodland”) became
unrepresented when the Court granted its former attorney’s motion to be
relieved as counsel. Goodland has not
since filed a Substitution of Attorney form.
On January 20, 2023, Plaintiff filed a motion to strike (the “Motion”)
Goodland’s Answer on the basis that Goodland is unable to participate in this
action since it is unrepresented by counsel. The Motion additionally requests
that the Court enter Goodland’s default.
DISCUSSION
Meet
and Confer
The meet and
confer requirement has been met.
Legal
Standard
A motion to strike either: (1) strikes any
irrelevant, false or improper matter inserted in any pleading; or (2) strikes
any pleading or part thereof not drawn or filed in conformity with the laws of
this state, a court rule or order of court. (CCP § 436.)
Representation
of Corporations
In
general, a corporation cannot represent itself in a court of record either in
propria persona or through an officer or agent who is not an attorney. (Caressa Camille, Inc. v. Alcoholic
Beverage Control Appeals Bd. (2002) 99 Cal.App.4th 1094, 1101.) After
withdrawal of their attorneys, corporations must obtain substitute counsel, or
risk forfeiting important rights due to nonrepresentation. (Gamet v.
Blanchard (2001) 91 Cal.App.4th 1276, 1284, n. 5.) A corporation’s
representation by an attorney is not an absolute prerequisite to the court’s
fundamental power to hear or determine a case, and it is appropriate for the
court to treat a corporation’s failure to be represented by an attorney as a
defect that may be corrected, on such terms as are just in the sound discretion
of the court. (CLD Construction, Inc.
v. City of San Ramon (2004) 120 Cal.App.4th 1141, 1149.) The Court
retains authority to dismiss an action if an unrepresented corporation does not
obtain counsel within reasonable time. (Id.
at 1150.)
The Court notes that the case
management conference to discuss the status of Goodland’s representation that
was initially scheduled when the Court relieved Goodland’s former attorney has
been continued to the date of this hearing.
The Court also observes that when the Answer was filed, Goodland was
represented by counsel and the Answer was therefore not improperly filed. Without knowing more information about the
status of Goodland’s representation, the Court presently declines to take
action to strike the Answer.
The Court therefore DENIES the
Motion without prejudice.
Moving party
is ordered to give notice of this ruling.
In consideration of the current COVID-19
pandemic situation, the Court¿strongly¿encourages that appearances on
all proceedings, including this one, be made by LACourtConnect if the
parties do not submit on the tentative.¿¿If you instead intend to make an
appearance in person at Court on this matter, you must send an email by 2 p.m.
on the last Court day before the scheduled date of the hearing to¿SMC_DEPT56@lacourt.org¿stating your intention to appear in person.¿ The Court will then
inform you by close of business that day of the time your hearing will be held.
The time set for the hearing may be at any time during that scheduled hearing
day, or it may be necessary to schedule the hearing for another date if the
Court is unable to accommodate all personal appearances set on that date.¿ This
rule is necessary to ensure that adequate precautions can be taken for proper
social distancing.
Parties
who intend to submit on this tentative must send an email to the Court at
SMC_DEPT56@lacourt.org as directed by the instructions provided on the court
website at www.lacourt.org. If the department does not receive an email
and there are no appearances at the hearing, the motion will be placed off
calendar.
Dated
this 17th day of February 2023
|
|
|
|
Hon. Holly J. Fujie Judge of the Superior Court |