Judge: Holly J. Fujie, Case: 22STCV10702, Date: 2022-08-17 Tentative Ruling
Case Number: 22STCV10702 Hearing Date: August 17, 2022 Dept: 56
SUPERIOR
COURT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA
FOR
THE COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES - CENTRAL DISTRICT
HAMLIN DESIGNS, LLC, Plaintiff, vs. ROYAL HOLDINGS TECHNOLOGIES CORPORATION,
et al.,
Defendants. |
|
[TENTATIVE] ORDER RE: PRO HAC VICE APPLICATION Date: 8:30 a.m. Time: August 17, 2022 Department: 56 |
MOVING PARTY:
Defendants
Defendants’
Applications of Stacy Dasaro and Howard Steel to be admitted pro hac vice
(collectively, the “Applications”) comply with the requirements of California
Rules of Court, rule 9.40, except
insofar as the Proofs of Service filed with the Applications do not indicate
that the State Bar of California was served therewith at its San Francisco
Office, as required by that rule, although the Applications state that the
required fees were paid to the State Bar and that the State Bar was served with
copies of the Applications. The Court
has considered the Applications. No
opposition papers were filed. Any
opposition papers were required to have been filed and served at least nine
court days prior to the hearing under California Code of Civil Procedure
section 1005, subdivision (b). If
Defendants submit Proofs of Service at or before the time of the hearing
showing that the State Bar of California was served at the time of the filing
of the Applications, the Court will GRANT the Applications under Sexton v.
Superior Court (1997) 58 Cal.App.4th 1403, 1410.
Moving party is ordered to give notice of
this ruling.
In consideration of the current COVID-19
pandemic situation, the Court¿strongly¿encourages that appearances on
all proceedings, including this one, be made by LACourtConnect if the
parties do not submit on the tentative.¿¿If you instead intend to make an appearance
in person at Court on this matter, you must send an email by 2 p.m. on the last
Court day before the scheduled date of the hearing to¿SMC_DEPT56@lacourt.org¿stating your intention to appear in person.¿ The Court will then
inform you by close of business that day of the time your hearing will be held.
The time set for the hearing may be at any time during that scheduled hearing
day, or it may be necessary to schedule the hearing for another date if the
Court is unable to accommodate all personal appearances set on that date.¿ This
rule is necessary to ensure that adequate precautions can be taken for proper
social distancing.
Parties
who intend to submit on this tentative must send an email to the Court at
SMC_DEPT56@lacourt.org as directed by the instructions provided on the court
website at www.lacourt.org. If the department does not receive an email
and there are no appearances at the hearing, the motion will be placed off calendar.
Dated this 17th day of August
2022
|
|
|
Hon. Holly J.
Fujie Judge of the
Superior Court |