Judge: Holly J. Fujie, Case: 22STCV11217, Date: 2023-01-17 Tentative Ruling
Case Number: 22STCV11217 Hearing Date: January 17, 2023 Dept: 56
SUPERIOR
COURT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA
FOR
THE COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES - CENTRAL DISTRICT
|
Plaintiff, vs. ZASH GLOBAL MEDIA AND ENTERTAINMENT
CORPORATION, et al.,
Defendants. |
|
[TENTATIVE] ORDER RE: MOTION TO BE
RELIEVED AS COUNSEL Date:
January 17, 2023 Time: 8:30 a.m. Dept. 56 Jury Trial: October 9, 2023 |
AND RELATED CROSS-ACTION
MOVING PARTY: Jeffrey A. Meyers (“Meyers”)
Meyers
seeks to be relieved as counsel for Plaintiff Ficto Holdings LLC (“Plaintiff”). Meyers’s motion to be relieved as counsel
(the “Motion”) is compliant with California Rules of Court, rule 3.1362.
The Motion is unopposed. Any
opposition papers were required to have been filed and served at least nine
court days before the hearing under California Code of Civil Procedure
section 1005, subdivision (b).[1]
DISCUSSION
The
court has discretion on whether to allow an attorney to withdraw, and a motion
to withdraw will not be granted where withdrawal would prejudice the
client. (Ramirez v. Sturdevant (1994) 21 Cal.App.4th 904, 915.)
In
support of the Motion, Meyers declares that irreconcilable differences have
arisen that have eroded the trust and confidence of the attorney-client
relationship such that it is unreasonably difficult to continue the
representation. The Court finds this to
be an adequate basis for withdrawal. For
this reason and because it is unopposed, the Court GRANTS the Motion. (Sexton
v. Superior Court (1997) 58 Cal.App.4th 1403, 1410.) As a business entity, Plaintiff
must be represented by counsel. (See Caressa
Camille, Inc. v. Alcoholic Beverage Control Appeals Bd. (2002) 99
Cal.App.4th 1094, 1101.) The Court will
hold an OSC regarding Plaintiff’s representation on February 7, 2023 at 8:30
a.m. in this department.
Moving
party is ordered to give notice of this ruling.
In consideration
of the current COVID-19 pandemic situation, the Court¿strongly¿encourages
that appearances on all proceedings, including this one, be made
by LACourtConnect if the parties do not submit on the tentative.¿¿If
you instead intend to make an appearance in person at Court on this matter, you
must send an email by 2 p.m. on the last Court day before the scheduled date of
the hearing to¿SMC_DEPT56@lacourt.org¿stating your intention to appear in person.¿
The Court will then inform you by close of business that day of the time your
hearing will be held. The time set for the hearing may be at any time during
that scheduled hearing day, or it may be necessary to schedule the hearing for
another date if the Court is unable to accommodate all personal appearances set
on that date.¿ This rule is necessary to ensure that adequate precautions can
be taken for proper social distancing.
Parties who intend to submit on this
tentative must send an email to the Court at SMC_DEPT56@lacourt.org as directed
by the instructions provided on the court website at www.lacourt.org. If
the department does not receive an email and there are no appearances at the
hearing, the motion will be placed off calendar.
Dated this 17th day of January 2023
|
|
|
|
|
Hon.
Holly J. Fujie Judge
of the Superior Court |
[1] On January 3, 2023, Defendants
Vincent Butta, Jaeson Ma, and Theodore Farnsworth filed a notice of
non-opposition to the Motion.