Judge: Holly J. Fujie, Case: 23STCV29875, Date: 2025-05-28 Tentative Ruling
Case Number: 23STCV29875 Hearing Date: May 28, 2025 Dept: 56
SUPERIOR
COURT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA
FOR
THE COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES - CENTRAL DISTRICT
ADELA JUAREZ, Plaintiff, vs. LARCHMONT TACO SHOP 26, INC.; TACOS TV MADRE; and DOES 1 through 100, inclusive,
Defendants. |
|
[TENTATIVE] ORDER RE: MOTION TO ENFORCE SETTLEMENT Date: May 28, 2025 Time: 8:30 a.m. Dept. 56 |
MOVING
PARTY: Plaintiff Adela Juarez (“Plaintiff”)
RESPONDING
PARTY: Defendants Larchmont Taco Shop 26, Inc. and Tacos Tu Madre
(“Defendants”)
The Court has considered the moving
papers. No opposition has been filed. Any opposition was required to have been
filed by May 14, 2025. (Code of Civil Procedure (“CCP”), § 1005, subd. (b)
[opposition must be filed at least nine court days prior to the hearing].)
BACKGROUND
This action arises out of an
employment relationship. On December 7, 2023, Plaintiff filed a complaint
against Larchmont Taco Shop 26, Inc. and Tacos Tu Madre (collectively
“Defendants”). The operative first amended complaint alleges causes of action
for: (1) Wrongful Termination in Violation of Public Policy; (2) Retaliation in
Violation [Government Code (“Gov. Code”) § 12940(h)]; (3) Employment
Discrimination Based on Disability [Gov. Code § 12940(a)]; (4) Employment
Discrimination Based Upon Race and Nationality [Gov. Code § 12940(a)]; (5)
Hostile Work Environment and Harassment in the Work Place; (6) Intentional
Infliction of Emotional Distress; (7) Failure to Accommodate Disability [Gov.
Code §§ 12940(m) and 12926(p)]; (8) Failure to Engage in the Interactive
Process [ Gov. Code § 12940(n)]; (9) Violation of Labor Code § 1102.5(b); (10)
Violation of Labor Code § 1102.5(c); (11) Violation of Labor Code § 1102.5(d);
(12) Breach of the Implied Covenant of Good Faith and Fair Dealing; (13)
Negligent Supervision and Retention; (14) Failure to Pay Minimum Wage [Labor
Code §§ 1182.12, 1194, 1194.2 and 1197]; (15) Failure to Pay Overtime [Labor
Code §§ 510 and 1194]; (16) Failure to Pay Meal Period Compensation [Labor Code
§§ 226.7 and 512]; (17) Failure to Pay Rest Period Compensation [Labor Code § 226.7;
IWC Wage Order No. 4-2001]; (18) Failure to Pay Wages in a Timely Manner [Labor
Code §§ 204]; (19) Failure to Pay Earned Wages [Labor Code §§ 204, 206 and
210]; (20) Failure to Pay Wages Due [Labor §§ 226 and 558]; (21) Waiting Time
Penalties [Labor Code §§ 201, 202 and 203]; (22) Failure to Furnish Timely and
Accurate Wage Statements [Labor Code § 226]; and (23) Unfair Business Practices
[Bus. & Prof. Code § 17200].
On February 27, 2025 Plaintiff filed
the instant motion to enforce settlement (the “Motion”). The Motion is
unopposed.
DISCUSSION
“If parties to pending litigation
stipulate, in a writing signed by the parties outside of the presence of the
court or orally before the court, for settlement of the case, or part thereof,
the court, upon motion, may enter judgment pursuant to the terms of the
settlement. If requested by the parties, the court may retain jurisdiction over
the parties to enforce the settlement until performance in full of the terms of
the settlement.” (Code of Civil Procedure (“CCP”), § 664.6, subd. (a).)
Plaintiff asserts that pursuant to a
September 20, 2024, settlement agreement (the “Agreement”) entered between the
parties, Plaintiff is entitled to a judgment of $13,085.00 consisting of: (1)
$10,000.000 outstanding under the Agreement; and (2) $3,085.00 in attorney’s
fees and costs. (Mot., pp. 3:24, 6:14-16; Nigro Decl., ¶ 12.) Plaintiff states
that Defendants have made only two payments under the Agreement and have
indicated that they will not remit the remaining balance of $10,000.00. (Mot.,
p. 3:20-24, Ex. 2.)
In relevant part, the Settlement Agreement
states as follows: “Defendants will pay a total settlement amount of $15,000
(Fifteen Thousand Dollars) (‘Settlement Sum’) to Plaintiff […] The Settlement
Sum shall be paid in 6 separate payments” comprising of $2,500.00 paid monthly beginning
on September 22, 2024 with the final payment to be made on February 22, 2024.
(Mot., Ex. 1, pp. 2-3.) Defendants have failed to oppose this Motion and thus
have offered no explanation for their failure to comply with the agreed upon
terms.
The Motion to Enforce Settlement is
GRANTED. Judgment is entered against Defendants in the amount of $10,000.00 as
well as $3,085.00 in attorney’s fees and costs.
Moving
Party is ordered to give notice of this ruling.
Parties who intend to submit on this
tentative must send an email to the Court at SMC_DEPT56@lacourt.org as directed
by the instructions provided on the court website at www.lacourt.org. If the department does not receive an email and
there are no appearances at the hearing, the motion will be placed off
calendar.
Dated this 28th day of May 2025
|
|
|
Hon. Holly J.
Fujie Judge of the
Superior Court |