Judge: Holly J. Fujie, Case: 24STCV08923, Date: 2025-04-10 Tentative Ruling
Case Number: 24STCV08923 Hearing Date: April 10, 2025 Dept: 56
SUPERIOR
COURT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA
FOR
THE COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES - CENTRAL DISTRICT
Plaintiffs, vs.
Defendants.
|
|
ORDER RE: DISCLOSURE OF FINANCIAL CONDITION Date: April 10, 2025 Time: 8:30 a.m. Dept. 56 |
BACKGROUND
On April 9, 2024, Silvia T. Reyes
and Perla A. Rubio (collectively, “Plaintiffs”) filed the complaint (the
“Complaint”) against defendants Cedrick Anthony Mitchell (“Mitchell”), Patricia
A. Heidelberg Black (“Black”), and DOES 1-100 (collectively, “Defendants”) for:
(1) strict liability – California dog bite law [Code of Civil Procedure (“CCP”)
§§ 3342(a); (2) negligence; and (3) negligence per se [Los Angeles County Code
§§ 10.32.010 et seq.].
On February 10, 2025, Plaintiffs
resubmitted their default judgment application seeking default against
defendant Mitchell. On March 6, 2025,
the Court denied the default judgment application, without prejudice. On March
17, 2025, the Court granted Plaintiff’s ex parte application to set a hearing for
disclosure of Mitchell’s financial condition.
DISCUSSION
Evidence of a defendant’s financial
condition is a prerequisite to the award of punitive damages, ensuring the
award of punitive damages is not excessive. (Adams v. Murakami (1991) 54
Cal.3d 105.) If a defendant fails to present records of their financial
condition, they may be estopped from later challenging the punitive damages
award for lack of evidence of their financial condition. (Garcia v. Myllylla
(2019) 40 Cal.App.5th 990, 995; Mike Davidov Co. v. Issod (2000) 78
Cal.App.4th 597, 609–610.)
Plaintiffs
request default judgment against Mitchell in the total sum of $1,645,050.94,
consisting of: (1) $4,086.64 in special damages; (2) $640,00.00 in general
damages; (3) $964.30 in costs; and (4) $1,000,000.00 in punitive damages. The
Court is unable to make a fully informed determination of whether an award of
$1,000,000.00 in punitive damages against Mitchell is excessive unless the
record contains evidence of Mitchell’s financial condition.
Cedrick Anthony Mitchell is hereby ORDERED
to produce evidence of his financial condition by May 12, 2025 in response to
the subpoena served upon him.
Plaintiffs are ordered to give notice of
this order.
Dated this 10th day of April 2025
|
|
|
Hon. Holly J.
Fujie Judge of the
Superior Court |