Judge: Holly J. Fujie, Case: 24STCV27076, Date: 2025-02-10 Tentative Ruling
Case Number: 24STCV27076 Hearing Date: February 10, 2025 Dept: 56
SUPERIOR
COURT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA
FOR
THE COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES - CENTRAL DISTRICT
UNITED FINANCIAL CASUALTY COMPANY, Petitioner, vs.
Respondent. |
|
[TENTATIVE] ORDER RE: MOTION TO COMPEL DEPOSITION Date: February 10, 2025 Time: 8:30 a.m. Dept. 56 |
MOVING PARTY: Petitioner United Financial Casualty Company
(“Petitioner”)
RESPONDING PARTY: None
The Court has considered the moving papers.
No opposition or reply has been filed.
BACKGROUND
On October 16, 2024, Petitioner petitioned the
Court to assign a case number for the purpose of enforcing discovery in an
uninsured motorist arbitration proceeding pursuant to Insurance Code section
11580.2 subdivision (f).
On November 26, 2024, Petitioner
filed the instant motion to compel deposition (the “Motion”). The Motion is
unopposed.
DISCUSSION
In general, “‘an arbitration has a
life of its own outside the judicial system.’” (Briggs v. Resolution
Remedies¿(2008) 168 Cal.App.4th 1395, 1401.) However, “Insurance Code
section 11580.2, subdivision (f) commits discovery disputes in uninsured
motorist arbitrations to the superior court.” (Id. fn. 6.)
This section provides that “Title 4 (commencing with Section 2016.010) of Part
4 of the Code of Civil Procedure shall be applicable to these determinations,
and all rights, remedies, obligations, liabilities and procedures set forth in
Title 4 (commencing with Section 2016.010) of Part 4 of the Code of Civil Procedure
shall be available to both the insured and the insurer at any time after the
accident, both before and after the commencement of arbitration[.]” (Ins.
Code, § 11580.2 subd. (f).) “Importantly, the statute then adopts the
California Civil Discovery Act in its entirety.” (Miranda v. 21st
Century Ins. Co.¿(2004) 117 Cal.App.4th 913, 920.) In these types of
arbitrations, depositions may be taken as permitted in any ordinary court
action without obtaining prior approval of the arbitrator. (Id. at p.
923.) The superior court has exclusive jurisdiction to hear
discovery matters arising under uninsured and underinsured motorist
arbitrations. (Id. at pp. 920, fn. 6, 926.)
If, [1] after service of a deposition
notice, [2] a party to the action or an officer, director, managing agent, or
employee of a party, or a person designated by an organization that is a party
under Code of Civil Procedure (“CCP”) section 2025.230, [3] without having
served a valid objection under section 2025.410, [4] fails to appear for
examination, or to proceed with it, or to produce for inspection any document,
electronically stored information, or tangible thing described in the
deposition notice, [5] the party giving the notice may move for an order
compelling the deponent’s attendance and testimony, and the production for
inspection of any document, electronically stored information, or tangible
thing described in the deposition notice. (CCP § 2025.450, subd. (a) [Arabic
numerals added for clarity].)
The motion shall also be accompanied by a
meet and confer declaration under section 2016.040, or, when the deponent fails
to attend the deposition and produce the documents, electronically stored
information, or things described in the deposition notice, by a declaration
stating that the petitioner has contacted the deponent to inquire about the
nonappearance. (CCP § 2025.450, subd. (b)(2).)
Petitioner noticed the deposition of
Respondent Yasi Vafai (“Respondent”) on July 9, 2024. (Mot., Ex. A.) Petitioner
states that Respondent failed to appear. Petitioner’s declaration does not show
that the parties met and conferred or that Petitioner contacted the Respondent
to inquire about the nonappearance. (Mullen Decl.; Mot., Ex. B; CCP § 2025.450,
subd. (b)(2).) Thus, the Motion is
DENIED, without prejudice.
Request for
Sanctions
If a motion under subdivision (a) is
granted, the court shall impose a monetary sanction under Chapter 7 (commencing
with Section 2023.010) in favor of the party who noticed the deposition and
against the deponent or the party with whom the deponent is affiliated, unless
the court finds that the one subject to the sanction acted with substantial
justification or that other circumstances make the imposition of the sanction
unjust. (CCP § 2025.450, subd. (g)(1).)
As the Motion has not been granted, the
request for sanctions is DENIED.
The Motion is DENIED, without
prejudice.
Moving
Party is ordered to give notice of this ruling.
Parties who intend to submit on this
tentative must send an email to the Court at SMC_DEPT56@lacourt.org as directed
by the instructions provided on the court website at www.lacourt.org. If the department does not receive an email
and there are no appearances at the hearing, the motion will be placed off
calendar.
Dated this 10th day of February 2025
|
|
|
Hon. Holly J.
Fujie Judge of the
Superior Court |